Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 17 Jan 2011 (Monday) 04:14
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

C&C - Music Shots

 
Mark ­ Brim
Senior Member
285 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Oct 2010
Location: UK
     
Jan 17, 2011 04:14 |  #1

Shot a gig on the weekend and have tried some different Processin on these ones..Wat do u think??

IMAGE: http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5170/5361991820_c8fb6a3a89_z.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/markbrim/536199​1820/  (external link)
Untitled (external link) by markbrim (external link), on Flickr

IMAGE: http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5244/5361372909_264e7c9ce0_z.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/markbrim/536137​2909/  (external link)
Untitled (external link) by markbrim (external link), on Flickr

5D, 7D, 30D. Sigma 30,50 1.4, Canon 70-200 f4, Sigma 10-20
Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/markbrim/ (external link)
Blog: http://http …brimacombe.word​press.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark ­ Brim
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
285 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Oct 2010
Location: UK
     
Jan 18, 2011 04:07 |  #2

Bump


5D, 7D, 30D. Sigma 30,50 1.4, Canon 70-200 f4, Sigma 10-20
Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/markbrim/ (external link)
Blog: http://http …brimacombe.word​press.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mpphotography
Member
101 posts
Joined Jul 2010
     
Jan 18, 2011 18:23 |  #3

The images themselves are quite good - a bit gritty and dark, but I'm assuming that fits with the band's style. I like the second one better than the first, for the simple reason that the subject in the first is in a "standard" pose that seems a bit overused.

However - it looks like you used a texture on the images that totally ruins them for me. It's distracting and annoying because it doesn't seem realistic. The texture seems too strong - too much detail sticking out and detracting from the more important images. I would remove the textures and rely on the strong images, or perhaps add a little film grain for more of a grit feel.

I'm also not too enthusiastic about the strong vingnette - assuming that you actually added one and it's not the lighting throwing me off. It seems contrived.

Both images are extremely high contrast. That's ok, as long as you don't mind losing all the details in the first subject's arm and fingers/frets. I personally would tone down the contrast a bit and open up the shadows a little more if it was my image.

I would also remove the lights in the second image in the upper right hand corner. They pull the eye away from the subject and aren't really needed. Some simple cloning should deal with them fairly quickly and easily.

I'm being super picky - overall, good work, just a little too much processing for my tastes :)


http://mpaulphotograph​y.wordpress.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark ­ Brim
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
285 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Oct 2010
Location: UK
     
Jan 19, 2011 04:01 |  #4

mpphotography wrote in post #11668549 (external link)
The images themselves are quite good - a bit gritty and dark, but I'm assuming that fits with the band's style. I like the second one better than the first, for the simple reason that the subject in the first is in a "standard" pose that seems a bit overused.

However - it looks like you used a texture on the images that totally ruins them for me. It's distracting and annoying because it doesn't seem realistic. The texture seems too strong - too much detail sticking out and detracting from the more important images. I would remove the textures and rely on the strong images, or perhaps add a little film grain for more of a grit feel.

I'm also not too enthusiastic about the strong vingnette - assuming that you actually added one and it's not the lighting throwing me off. It seems contrived.

Both images are extremely high contrast. That's ok, as long as you don't mind losing all the details in the first subject's arm and fingers/frets. I personally would tone down the contrast a bit and open up the shadows a little more if it was my image.

I would also remove the lights in the second image in the upper right hand corner. They pull the eye away from the subject and aren't really needed. Some simple cloning should deal with them fairly quickly and easily.

I'm being super picky - overall, good work, just a little too much processing for my tastes :)

Thanks man! glad u took the time to get bk to me! :)

Jus a few things to note, these were all Live shots taken at a gig, and the lightin was terrible, so i decided to try sumint different in the edit. hence addin the great big obvious texture feel to the images


5D, 7D, 30D. Sigma 30,50 1.4, Canon 70-200 f4, Sigma 10-20
Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/markbrim/ (external link)
Blog: http://http …brimacombe.word​press.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

496 views & 0 likes for this thread, 2 members have posted to it.
C&C - Music Shots
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2602 guests, 167 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.