Went out and shot my buddy Patricks truck that he has spent a lot of time on.
Let me know what you guys think.
1.
2.
vegasboy Goldmember  2,366 posts Likes: 47 Joined Sep 2005 Location: Los Angeles, CA More info | Jan 17, 2011 15:26 | #1 Went out and shot my buddy Patricks truck that he has spent a lot of time on. 2. -Alex
LOG IN TO REPLY |
muskyhunter Goldmember  1,137 posts Likes: 4 Joined Nov 2010 Location: Toronto, Canada More info | Jan 17, 2011 15:31 | #2 i dunno, i dont see the point in lowering a pickup?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
vegasboy THREAD STARTER Goldmember 2,366 posts Likes: 47 Joined Sep 2005 Location: Los Angeles, CA More info | Jan 17, 2011 15:35 | #3 muskyhunter wrote in post #11660210  i dunno, i dont see the point in lowering a pickup? Air suspension so it can go higher if need be. -Alex
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 17, 2011 15:40 | #4 Yeah it look way over loaded front to rear other than that it is nice. Canon T3I 6D 24-105L 100-400L Canon 430EX
LOG IN TO REPLY |
vegasboy THREAD STARTER Goldmember 2,366 posts Likes: 47 Joined Sep 2005 Location: Los Angeles, CA More info | Jan 17, 2011 15:43 | #6 kendon wrote in post #11660269 nice pictures. don't like the way the front wheels are angled, the rest looks very slick. lol@ the license plate  My buddy works IT for a big conglomerate so its fitting. lol -Alex
LOG IN TO REPLY |
vegasboy THREAD STARTER Goldmember 2,366 posts Likes: 47 Joined Sep 2005 Location: Los Angeles, CA More info | Jan 17, 2011 15:45 | #7 here is a bts of the second shot.  -Alex
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kendon Senior Member  839 posts Joined Jul 2010 Location: germany More info | Jan 17, 2011 16:02 | #8 vegasboy wrote in post #11660272 My buddy works IT for a big conglomerate so its fitting. lol haha me as well, it's my default reply, seriously. ppl call me, tell me something which includes several 15digit numbers and some arbitrary profile names and values, so i go "yeah i can do that, please email me exactly what you want me to do..." 7D, EF-S 10-22, EF-S 17-55, EF 70-200/4 IS, NiftyFifty, 580EXII, Σ 30 EX DC, Walimex 8mm Fisheye, MD Rokkor 50/1.4, BendyCam
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PhotosGuy Cream of the Crop, R.I.P.  More info | Jan 17, 2011 22:36 | #9 It's a nice, clean looking truck. I think it's got a snapped front axle, though. FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
NormanRC51 Senior Member  451 posts Joined Dec 2010 Location: Idaho More info | Jan 18, 2011 09:58 | #10 Like the truck. But one thing i did notice is in the first picture the reflection in the door is distracting, as it doesn't cover the whole side of the truck, just a portion. On the second picture the trees in the rear quarter don't do much for me either. Nice shoot tho and nice truck! Canon 7D - Gripped 40D - Canon 50 1.8 MK1 - Tamron 18-270 - Tamron 1.4x TC - Sigma 18-50 2.8 - Sigma 70-200 2.8 - Pair of AlienBee B1600s - 580EX - 3-540ez - RF-602
LOG IN TO REPLY |
crazypainter Member 105 posts Likes: 16 Joined Oct 2010 Location: OKC More info | Jan 18, 2011 23:30 | #11 I guess it takes a person with bagged rides to understand.......That's me.I have had a bagged jimmy,Astro,and i have a bagged VW Passat wagon now.Nice truck and i really like the second shot.Is he going to tub it so it lays out?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Chippy569 Goldmember  1,851 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2010 Location: Minneapolis, MN More info | Jan 18, 2011 23:59 | #12 Truck is pretty intense... backgrounds in your photos, not so much. The first one has a fence coming out of the roof, and the second one is just... plain. After driving in the dirt you got brown meh all over the tires. It's sort of weird to see a truck like that on dirt, actually... but it's just a dirt parking lot, not like a forest road so the juxtaposition doesn't quite work out. IMO an inner-city location would be better fitting for the truck. Gear List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jonpwn Member 172 posts Joined Apr 2009 More info | Jan 20, 2011 21:54 | #13 why is it that the rear has almost no camber? or is it cause it's an SUV with it's own chassis?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 20, 2011 21:57 | #14 jonpwn wrote in post #11682696 why is it that the rear has almost no camber? or is it cause it's an SUV with it's own chassis? Rear = solid axle.... lower it as much as you want, and the camber doesn't change.... unlike the front, which is independent. Canon 5dmkIII, Sigma 15mm f/2.8FE; 35mm f/1.4; Canon EF70-200 f/2.8L IS II; --- YN560 x 7
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2820 guests, 168 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
