Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 18 Jan 2011 (Tuesday) 15:02
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

First Timer: Fix or buy a new one?

 
rogue.guineapig
Senior Member
Avatar
302 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 67
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Phoenix
     
Jan 18, 2011 15:02 |  #1

Hey folks,


short time lurker, first time poster.

I have a Canon Digital Rebel XT that I love. I also have an
EFS-IS 17-85mm lens, by UltraSonic, and I love it too.

Unfortunately, the lens is not working properly...
the aperture gets stuck when I'm shooting, resulting in an Error 99.
I've heard that does happen with this lens sometimes. :(

I live in AZ, and Tempe Camera says that they can probably fix this for under $250.
It might be less, or it might be more...they need to look at it to tell me how much.

I'm wondering: where's the cut-off point? Are there decent L-series Lenses for a
few dollars more? At what point does fixing this lens become a bad idea?

I use the cam for ebay, for memories, and for business--as in
some light-duty photojournalism type work at a local college.

Thanks so much for your advice!

-mac


Canon 6D w/MagicLantern, 16-35 f/2.8LII, 100mm f/2.8L, 70-200 f/2.8LII, 300mm f/4L, and a lot of luck

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
carlXSI
Senior Member
315 posts
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Bay Area, CA
     
Jan 18, 2011 15:17 |  #2

Welcome to POTN!

First off, your lens is made by Canon. Ultrasonic is the type of focusing mechanism it uses. As for the repair, I wouldn't bother. The 17-85 isn't the greatest lens. I suggest getting the successor to it, the Canon 15-85. If you are on a limited budget then perhaps the Canon 18-55 IS or Tamron 17-50 should fit your needs. Unfortunately there aren't any L lenses near $250. I hope this helps.


6D | 17-40L | 70-200L | 35 2.0 IS | 430ex II | flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DreDaze
happy with myself for not saying anything stupid
Avatar
18,407 posts
Gallery: 49 photos
Likes: 3431
Joined Mar 2006
Location: S.F. Bay Area
     
Jan 18, 2011 15:30 |  #3

i wouldn't pay that much...you could probably sell the lens in it's current condition for $150 or so...and just use that money towards one of the suggestions by Carl


Andre or Dre
gear list
Instagram (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rogue.guineapig
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
302 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 67
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Phoenix
     
Jan 18, 2011 15:34 |  #4

Hey Carl,


thanks for the advice! At the moment I've got an uber-cheapo Sigma 18-50 on the Reb,
and I hate it with a passion...it makes me want my old lens back, or at least a better lens.
So, by way of comparison I really do like the 17-85 compared to what's on there now. :)

I don't mind buying used (in fact I probably will have to), and I was thinking of an L series only if the repair bill went up towards $400ish.
I figured an extra few bucks on top of that for a way better lens might be worth it.

In terms of the 15-85, is that this lens?
http://cgi.ebay.com …enses&hash=item​45f81fccac (external link)

And the 18-55 is this one?
http://cgi.ebay.com …enses&hash=item​4cf46800b2 (external link)

I might add, my photojournalism work would include some sports, hence my desire to have
the 85mm -or longer- (focal length?) at the far end.
By way of explanation, I'm the student editor for our local college newspaper. Unfortunately,
both my photographers are still life shooters, and one of them is flat out terrible at shooting
anything other than lakes and flowers. I may not be much of a photographer, but I can shoot
better action shots than this other guy, so I figured I'd just do some of the work myself.

Thanks for the clarification on the "Ultrasonic" part...that does help.
Like I said, I'm not much of a "real" photographer...I just enjoy it and do it when I need to.

thanks again for the advice!

mac


Canon 6D w/MagicLantern, 16-35 f/2.8LII, 100mm f/2.8L, 70-200 f/2.8LII, 300mm f/4L, and a lot of luck

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,919 posts
Gallery: 561 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14913
Joined Dec 2006
     
Jan 18, 2011 15:40 |  #5

rogue.guineapig wrote in post #11667448 (external link)
Hey Carl,


thanks for the advice! At the moment I've got an uber-cheapo Sigma 18-50 on the Reb,
and I hate it with a passion...it makes me want my old lens back, or at least a better lens.
So, by way of comparison I really do like the 17-85 compared to what's on there now. :)

I don't mind buying used (in fact I probably will have to), and I was thinking of an L series only if the repair bill went up towards $400ish.
I figured an extra few bucks on top of that for a way better lens might be worth it.

In terms of the 15-85, is that this lens?
http://cgi.ebay.com …enses&hash=item​45f81fccac (external link)

And the 18-55 is this one?
http://cgi.ebay.com …enses&hash=item​4cf46800b2 (external link)

I might add, my photojournalism work would include some sports, hence my desire to have
the 85mm -or longer- (focal length?) at the far end.
By way of explanation, I'm the student editor for our local college newspaper. Unfortunately,
both my photographers are still life shooters, and one of them is flat out terrible at shooting
anything other than lakes and flowers. I may not be much of a photographer, but I can shoot
better action shots than this other guy, so I figured I'd just do some of the work myself.

Thanks for the clarification on the "Ultrasonic" part...that does help.
Like I said, I'm not much of a "real" photographer...I just enjoy it and do it when I need to.

thanks again for the advice!

mac

85 isnt going to be that much more useful than 55 when it comes to sports, heck 200mm is still short for most sports so forget a one lens solution for that. Get the new kit lens, the 18-55IS. Its a great little lens for about a hundred. Try it a few days and if it works for you that will free up the cash for a 55-250IS or some other addition to your kit.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,756 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
First Timer: Fix or buy a new one?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1478 guests, 137 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.