skater911 Goldmember  1,281 posts Likes: 3 Joined Dec 2006 More info | Jan 20, 2011 14:15 | #1 Well I need an intermidate zoom and have missed my 70-200 since I sold it two or three years ago. I don't like having to take off and put on extenders, but also do not want two huge zooms either. Is the 2.8 mk I or mk ii with a 2x extender the same or better than the 150-500 naked. I know it isn't a 500, but with the 1.3 it would be close to that. Thanks for the insight. Nikon D850 l Nikon 28 1.4E l Nikon 50 1.8 g l Nikon 24-120 F4 l Tamron 100-400 l
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JasonC do I need to submit a resume...? More info | Jan 21, 2011 00:37 | #2 Only one aspect of a comparison: Equipment & Feedback
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 22, 2011 08:18 | #3 Jason C wrote in post #11683422  Only one aspect of a comparison: 70-200/2.8L is v.1 w/2xTC MKII vs. Sigma 150-500/5-6.3 OS @ 400mm 70-200/2.8L is MKII W/2xTC MKIII vs. Sigma 150-500/5-6.3 OS @ 400mm Jason C I saw that site but was hoping someone had some actual experience with them. Thanks for the info. Nikon D850 l Nikon 28 1.4E l Nikon 50 1.8 g l Nikon 24-120 F4 l Tamron 100-400 l
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Monkeytoes 1351 guests, 180 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
