Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon G-series Digital Cameras 
Thread started 15 Sep 2005 (Thursday) 13:55
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

External flash with G6

 
Pixels
Senior Member
Avatar
454 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jul 2003
Location: Ireland
     
Sep 15, 2005 13:55 |  #1

This question may have arisen before, but basically what I want to do is get an external flash unit for use with G6. I note the manual recommends 220ex, 420ex, 550ex and 580ex units. My questions are as follows:
1) Will an external flash unit on a G6 work in TTL mode?
2) Is E-TTL better than TTL and if so can it work on a G6?
3) Is the basic 220ex much more powerful than the built-in flash on the G6?
4) Apart from power and range, what quality advantages are got by using an external flash unit?
5) Are the more expensive units worth the extra outlay?

I would not be a habitual flash user, but would like to get more natural results taking people, and to be able to get adequate results in a large room.

I would appreciate any help/opinions on these points.


Canon 24-105 L IS USM,
Canon 400mm L f5.6
Canon 7D, Canon 1.4 TCII
Canon 10-22, Canon 420EX speedlite,

Olympus OMD EM5, 20-40 f2.8 PRO

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Robert_Lay
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,546 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Spotsylvania Co., VA
     
Sep 15, 2005 15:28 |  #2

Pros:
a) Higher flash power output
b) can use bounce

Cons:
a) heavier
b) moves center of gravity higher (unwieldy)


Bob
Quality of Light (external link), Photo Tool ver 2.0 (external link)
Canon Rebel XTi; EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-f/5.6 USM; EF-S 18-55 mm f/3.5-f/5.6; EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM; EF 50mm f/1.4 USM; Canon Powershot G5; Canon AE1(2); Leica R4s; Battery Grip BG-E3; Pentax Digital Spotmeter with Zone VI Mod & Calibration.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pixels
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
454 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jul 2003
Location: Ireland
     
Sep 16, 2005 12:48 |  #3

Thanks Robert, those are helpful points.


Canon 24-105 L IS USM,
Canon 400mm L f5.6
Canon 7D, Canon 1.4 TCII
Canon 10-22, Canon 420EX speedlite,

Olympus OMD EM5, 20-40 f2.8 PRO

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jeffrey ­ r
Junior Member
24 posts
Joined Aug 2005
     
Sep 16, 2005 12:59 |  #4

The G6 and the Canon flashes are E-TTL compatible. I use the 420EX and love it. Basically, you place it on the hotshoe, lock it in, turn the flash on, and it's good to go. The 420EX is fully automatic with the G6, and for an amateur like me, that makes it very easy to use. Other than tweaking the output using the flash compensation in the G6 menu from time to time, there's not much to it.

From what I have read, the 220EX works fine with the G6, but does not present a huge difference from the built-in flash. Sure it works better than the built-in, but you'll need to step up to the 420 or better for exceptional performance.

Since you asked about the quality advantages in using the external flash, I would say in layman's terms that my pictures are dramatically "richer" with the 420. If I am taking indoor pictures of my son in our living room, using the built-in flash, the pictures come out fine, but are lacking something. He'll usually be exposed fine, but the rest of the picture might be flat. With the 420, especially using the bounce, it is a better, richer picture. Hard to describe, but you would see for yourself.

Good luck.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pixels
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
454 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jul 2003
Location: Ireland
     
Sep 17, 2005 04:05 as a reply to  @ jeffrey r's post |  #5

Thanks Jeffry for those comments and greetings from ireland!Yes from what you say I think the 420 (or 430, as I think the 420 has been discontinued) makes more sense and would be worth the extra outlay over the 220. Also I don't think the 220 can swivel for bounce shots. Also I may later move to a Canon digital SLR, so the 420 would work with that also.
All the best for now


Canon 24-105 L IS USM,
Canon 400mm L f5.6
Canon 7D, Canon 1.4 TCII
Canon 10-22, Canon 420EX speedlite,

Olympus OMD EM5, 20-40 f2.8 PRO

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pixels
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
454 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jul 2003
Location: Ireland
     
Sep 17, 2005 12:17 as a reply to  @ Pixels's post |  #6

After some consideration I went ahead and got the 420EX today. My first impressions are favourable, but I will put it through its paces over the next few days, and will post my comments for anyone interested.


Canon 24-105 L IS USM,
Canon 400mm L f5.6
Canon 7D, Canon 1.4 TCII
Canon 10-22, Canon 420EX speedlite,

Olympus OMD EM5, 20-40 f2.8 PRO

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lefturn99
Senior Member
Avatar
820 posts
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma USA
     
Sep 18, 2005 21:30 |  #7

The first impressions quote is telling. I have been frustrated by the poor manual and lack of information on my 420ex. It has lots of buttons and lights that I don't really understand.

On the other hand, it helps me take excellent pictures right out of the box. Just turn it on and make sure the slider above the on-off slider is on the green dot. Adjust the strength of the flash from the camera in the FUNC button menu.

I use fill flash in daylight almost as much as I do indoors or at night.

It bugs me that I don't really understand it (I guess I do understand when you hear the thing whirring it is adjusting the focus and strength of the flash based on the camera's exposure and focus distance determination) but I guess if it works, .........


6D, 5D Mk III, 60D, EOS M, Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Superbaldguy
Senior Member
355 posts
Joined Sep 2004
Location: New Germany, N.S.
     
Sep 19, 2005 04:07 as a reply to  @ lefturn99's post |  #8

Another alternative is the 550EX, of course. Since it is now discontinued, the price should be quite good on one if you can find it. It has a bit more power (25% actually) than the 420EX and can use an external battery pack for faster recycling times.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
markubig
Goldmember
Avatar
1,953 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2004
Location: NJ USA
     
Sep 22, 2005 00:11 as a reply to  @ Superbaldguy's post |  #9

Superbaldguy wrote:
Another alternative is the 550EX, of course. Since it is now discontinued, the price should be quite good on one if you can find it. It has a bit more power (25% actually) than the 420EX and can use an external battery pack for faster recycling times.

you could find a used 550ex for $220-$250 if you keep a look-out ... bought mine out of POTN marketplace forum for $225 back in march, I believe, and it was in like-new condition. The only negative would be that it looks enormous mounted on a G6.


~Mark
Canon 7D |40D
Canon EF-S 17-55 f/2.8 IS USM | Tamron SP 70-200 f/2.8 Di VC USD | Canon EF-S 60mm f/2.8 MACRO USM

Canon Speedlites 580exII, 5800ex

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kring
Member
Avatar
68 posts
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Central Connecticut
     
Sep 23, 2005 08:25 as a reply to  @ markubig's post |  #10

I'll start with saying I'm not a pro, but I decided to go for the 420eX with my G6 and am very happy. In my experience so far I have 2 suggestions if you go with this unit.

1.) Get an Omni Bounce for approx $15.00 more, I found that the 420EX was WAY to harsh of lighting for nearly all indoor photo's. over exposure all over, even if you turn down flash in camera or even if you try and bounce the light (which seems to distort color). Outdoor it's great, we had a late evening BBQ and the flash was so powerful the photo's came out like it was daytime. Problem is this power is way too much for indoor pictures, especially for family shots like I'm using for our new baby being 10 feet away, it's very crisp lgiht coming out of this flash. Adding the Sto-fen Omni bounce was the best add-on to my kit.. I'd take it over a 2nd battery anyday!

2.) Have PLENTY of extra flash batteries and make sure they are always charged! IMO there is a bug with this flash/camera combo. First, there's no battery life indicator, so it's a guessing game, as the batteries get lower, the flash still works, however it improperly communicates with the G6 causing horribly blurry pictures. Basically what the flash does is tell the camera, I'm working fine, flash is fully charged, but you should open your shutter to 1 or 2 seconds. Obviously with a shutter speed that long no hand will keep it steady... so the result is terrible pictures. To a novice it seems like the camera is not working because you see the flash and everything appears to be normal, when actually it the flash's batteries causing all your blurry pictures.

As a novice it took me a while to read the forums get advice and figure out the issues. I absolutly love this combo and nearly all of my pictures are take with the 420EX w/Omnibounce. it's a great combo overall once you understand these two issues which could be very frustrating. I don't think anyone has regrested adding the 420ex in my time reading the forums.


Canon 30D
Canon Rebel XT Silver
Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM
Canon EF-S 17-85mm IS USM (Hoya Pro1 UV & Lens Hood)
Canon 430EX Flash (Sto Fen Omni-Bounce)


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lefturn99
Senior Member
Avatar
820 posts
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma USA
     
Sep 23, 2005 08:35 |  #11

Agree with the Omnibounce. I've never noticed the battery problem. The batteries do last a long time and I usually charge them before going out on a "shoot".

Side note. In my photography class, several of the old ladies have dSLRs with the flash extenders (the L shaped brackets that raise the flash above the camera). Not a bad deal, but they leave them on all the time. Wouldn't that look cool on a G6? :)


6D, 5D Mk III, 60D, EOS M, Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mknabster
Senior Member
Avatar
827 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Limerick, PA, USA
     
Sep 23, 2005 10:15 as a reply to  @ lefturn99's post |  #12

If you look on Canon's website, they don't sell the 420 EX anymore. Now, they have the 430 EX. So, it's just something to let you aware of.


- Matt

MK Studios (external link)
My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bosman
Senior Member
835 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 1
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Pittsburgh
     
Sep 23, 2005 14:05 as a reply to  @ kring's post |  #13

kring wrote:
I'll start with saying I'm not a pro, but I decided to go for the 420eX with my G6 and am very happy. In my experience so far I have 2 suggestions if you go with this unit.

1.) Get an Omni Bounce for approx $15.00 more, I found that the 420EX was WAY to harsh of lighting for nearly all indoor photo's. over exposure all over, even if you turn down flash in camera or even if you try and bounce the light (which seems to distort color). Outdoor it's great, we had a late evening BBQ and the flash was so powerful the photo's came out like it was daytime. Problem is this power is way too much for indoor pictures, especially for family shots like I'm using for our new baby being 10 feet away, it's very crisp lgiht coming out of this flash. Adding the Sto-fen Omni bounce was the best add-on to my kit.. I'd take it over a 2nd battery anyday!

2.) Have PLENTY of extra flash batteries and make sure they are always charged! IMO there is a bug with this flash/camera combo. First, there's no battery life indicator, so it's a guessing game, as the batteries get lower, the flash still works, however it improperly communicates with the G6 causing horribly blurry pictures. Basically what the flash does is tell the camera, I'm working fine, flash is fully charged, but you should open your shutter to 1 or 2 seconds. Obviously with a shutter speed that long no hand will keep it steady... so the result is terrible pictures. To a novice it seems like the camera is not working because you see the flash and everything appears to be normal, when actually it the flash's batteries causing all your blurry pictures.

As a novice it took me a while to read the forums get advice and figure out the issues. I absolutly love this combo and nearly all of my pictures are take with the 420EX w/Omnibounce. it's a great combo overall once you understand these two issues which could be very frustrating. I don't think anyone has regrested adding the 420ex in my time reading the forums.



I also have a G6 and 420ex. I use non rechargable Energizers and carry and extra set in my bag. I never wanted to have worry about charging batteries for the flash. Canon says you should get like 200 to 300 flashes and I'd say that is pretty acurate. So at about $4.50 for 8 at walmart I thought it was the way to go.
Anyway I was more interested in your experience with the OmniBounce. I too have at times had that "harseness" you talked about. I thought though that the 420ex trottled down the flash in some modes? Could it be the mode you are using? The other question I had was do you need to increase the intensity of the flash any when using the OmniBounce?


Joe

Rebel XT with grip
Tamron SP AF28-75mm F/2.8 XR Di LD Aspherical (IF)
Canon 18-55 3.5-5.6
Canon 50 1.8
420EX
Domke
F-3X
Domke F-5XB

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kring
Member
Avatar
68 posts
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Central Connecticut
     
Sep 26, 2005 12:24 as a reply to  @ Bosman's post |  #14

Bosman wrote:
I also have a G6 and 420ex. I use non rechargable Energizers and carry and extra set in my bag. I never wanted to have worry about charging batteries for the flash. Canon says you should get like 200 to 300 flashes and I'd say that is pretty acurate. So at about $4.50 for 8 at walmart I thought it was the way to go.
Anyway I was more interested in your experience with the OmniBounce. I too have at times had that "harseness" you talked about. I thought though that the 420ex trottled down the flash in some modes? Could it be the mode you are using? The other question I had was do you need to increase the intensity of the flash any when using the OmniBounce?

The 420EX I believe has some control based on it's pre-flash exposure test, it seems it can only increase flash and I believe it looks at overall exposure (from what I understand) it doesn't really look to see that everything is well exposed, I would find that the on subjects forehead or if they have a light pastel color shirt, that becomes unrepairably overexposed while the rest is good, if you turn down the flash, now the whole picture is underexposed... too much post processing for just shooting family photo's. The harshenss I see is because it's a direct blast of focused light, like a flashlight (it has a limited cone of light)pointed at the subject and the center is extremely concentrated. The omnibounce is more like a flood light in the room, it's very well difussed light, and when going off it's much easier on the subjects eye's. I did not need to make ANY adjustments to my flash settings. I just put it on and started shooting, perfect pictures everytime!

Think of it like looking directly into a clear light bulb vs looking into a frosted glass light fixture. they both light the room, but the frosting makes for much softer light. The Omnibounce is just a frosted peice of plastic.

If your doing Indoor shot's it's a must.


Canon 30D
Canon Rebel XT Silver
Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM
Canon EF-S 17-85mm IS USM (Hoya Pro1 UV & Lens Hood)
Canon 430EX Flash (Sto Fen Omni-Bounce)


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bosman
Senior Member
835 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 1
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Pittsburgh
     
Sep 26, 2005 12:37 as a reply to  @ kring's post |  #15

kring wrote:
The 420EX I believe has some control based on it's pre-flash exposure test, it seems it can only increase flash and I believe it looks at overall exposure (from what I understand) it doesn't really look to see that everything is well exposed, I would find that the on subjects forehead or if they have a light pastel color shirt, that becomes unrepairably overexposed while the rest is good, if you turn down the flash, now the whole picture is underexposed... too much post processing for just shooting family photo's. The harshenss I see is because it's a direct blast of focused light, like a flashlight (it has a limited cone of light)pointed at the subject and the center is extremely concentrated. The omnibounce is more like a flood light in the room, it's very well difussed light, and when going off it's much easier on the subjects eye's. I did not need to make ANY adjustments to my flash settings. I just put it on and started shooting, perfect pictures everytime!

Think of it like looking directly into a clear light bulb vs looking into a frosted glass light fixture. they both light the room, but the frosting makes for much softer light. The Omnibounce is just a frosted peice of plastic.

If your doing Indoor shot's it's a must.

Thanks for the response. I orderd one last night.[Smile]

Can't wait till it gets here.

StoFen says they ship first class mail for only $2, so it should be here soon.


Joe

Rebel XT with grip
Tamron SP AF28-75mm F/2.8 XR Di LD Aspherical (IF)
Canon 18-55 3.5-5.6
Canon 50 1.8
420EX
Domke
F-3X
Domke F-5XB

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,386 views & 0 likes for this thread, 14 members have posted to it.
External flash with G6
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon G-series Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2278 guests, 93 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.