I wanted a dramatic portrait for my front page, pleased to hear your views.
Thanks
![]() | HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR |
superstes Goldmember 1,376 posts Likes: 2 Joined May 2007 Location: Southern France More info | Jan 23, 2011 09:48 | #1 I wanted a dramatic portrait for my front page, pleased to hear your views.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cjj14u Senior Member 604 posts Joined Jan 2009 Location: Knoxville, TN More info | Jan 23, 2011 09:50 | #2 I like it.... T1i X 2| T3i | 55-250is II | 18-55is II |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
superstes THREAD STARTER Goldmember 1,376 posts Likes: 2 Joined May 2007 Location: Southern France More info | Jan 23, 2011 10:21 | #3 Thanks cjj
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LisaJH Goldmember 1,887 posts Gallery: 15 photos Best ofs: 1 Likes: 2277 Joined Jul 2009 Location: Kingman, Arizona - United States More info | Jan 23, 2011 10:48 | #4 If I'm being honest, it is WAY too blown. There is no shape or texture left to her face at all, it just blends right in with the background. To me, dramatic would be having good areas of both highlights AND shadows to sculpt your subject's face and set the mood. This isn't working for me at all, sorry. ~Mom of 11 and Professional Photographer~
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Shockey Goldmember 1,187 posts Joined Jan 2010 Location: Boise Idaho More info | Jan 23, 2011 10:50 | #5 I wouldn't pick it but what are your other choices? ___________
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Slaterza Goldmember 2,007 posts Likes: 7 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Beijing, China More info | Jan 23, 2011 11:53 | #6 I feel it looks more like a floating eyes and mouth I Think I understand what you were looking for in the sense of a high key portrait but wearing the dark shirt did not help that and then the highlights are just blown so it doesn't come across as a nice piece more of an over exposed photo. I agree with Lisa that this would be better with highlights and shadows. Sam Laterza flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
superstes THREAD STARTER Goldmember 1,376 posts Likes: 2 Joined May 2007 Location: Southern France More info | Jan 23, 2011 13:42 | #7 LisaJH wrote in post #11697788 If I'm being honest, it is WAY too blown. There is no shape or texture left to her face at all, it just blends right in with the background. To me, dramatic would be having good areas of both highlights AND shadows to sculpt your subject's face and set the mood. This isn't working for me at all, sorry. Shockey wrote in post #11697799 I wouldn't pick it but what are your other choices? Doesn't do much to show off any photography skill. Slaterza wrote in post #11698164 I feel it looks more like a floating eyes and mouth I Think I understand what you were looking for in the sense of a high key portrait but wearing the dark shirt did not help that and then the highlights are just blown so it doesn't come across as a nice piece more of an over exposed photo. I agree with Lisa that this would be better with highlights and shadows. Thanks for the input, here is a tamed down version
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 23, 2011 14:17 | #8 I like them both. It just depends on the look you are trying to present. I'd probably prefer the second w/ more contrast. You aren't going to please all of us! Canon 60D, 5Diii, 24-105, 24-70ii, 70-200 f2.8 ii is, 580ex, (2)430ex
LOG IN TO REPLY |
say_cheese Senior Member More info | Jan 23, 2011 17:30 | #9 I like the toned down version, but I do find the black stripe of the shirt distracting. Good job! Tools: Canon 5DmkII, Sony a6400, Fujifilm X100V
LOG IN TO REPLY |
zelseman Goldmember 1,922 posts Likes: 34 Joined Mar 2008 Location: Tahlequah, OK More info | Jan 23, 2011 18:17 | #10 |
LeadBalloon Member 108 posts Joined Oct 2010 Location: Shelby, NC More info | Jan 23, 2011 18:25 | #11 Agreed, a little NR on the shirt, and it's a great one! The subtlety of the wrinkles around the mouth and shadows around the cheek bones just add that much more to the shot.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
photoinprogress Hatchling 6 posts Joined Oct 2010 More info | Jan 23, 2011 18:27 | #12 I like the 2nd one way better
LOG IN TO REPLY |
silverstang23 Senior Member 427 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jun 2010 More info | Jan 23, 2011 18:29 | #13 The second is much better. The image doesn't seem very crisp to me. Lots of noise on the black areas too Andrew Walker
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RichardA Senior Member 463 posts Likes: 1 Joined Feb 2009 Location: Oklahoma More info | Jan 23, 2011 19:22 | #14 I like them, I actually really like the first one more for a site front page Richard
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JGelks2007 Senior Member 341 posts Joined Mar 2009 More info | Jan 23, 2011 20:20 | #15 Not bad, although I think there's probably too much noise for a front page photo. 7D, 430EX II, EF-S 17-55mm F2.8 IS, EF 70-200mm F4L, Canon Powershot SD940 IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is MWCarlsson 1001 guests, 145 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||