Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 23 Jan 2011 (Sunday) 13:16
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

ISO 400

 
antifire
Senior Member
Avatar
667 posts
Joined Oct 2010
Location: Munich, Germany
     
Jan 23, 2011 13:16 |  #1

A lot of glamor and wedding photography I've been checking out seems to be shot at ISO 400 with flash. Why? Wouldn't ISO 100 be better?



[Dan | Flickr (external link) | Facebook (external link) |www.HDLuk[COLOR="Black"].com (external link)]
Canon 5DmkII
Zeiss 2.8/21ZE | Zeiss 2.0/35ZE | Zeiss 2.0/100ZE MP | Canon 24-105L f/4 IS | Canon 70-200L f/4 IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sdiver2489
Goldmember
2,845 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 113
Joined Sep 2009
     
Jan 23, 2011 13:33 |  #2

In Manual mode if ISO is left on auto then it will be fixed at ISO 400. My guess is that a large portion of photographers leave their camera on auto ISO.


Please visit my Flickr (external link) and leave a comment!

Gear:
Canon 5D III, Canon 24-70L F4 IS, Canon 70-300L F4-F5.6 IS, Canon 100mm F2.8L IS Macro, Canon 35mm F2.0 IS, Canon 430EX II-RT, Canon 600EX II-RT

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pophoto
Senior Member
580 posts
Joined Aug 2009
     
Jan 23, 2011 13:55 |  #3

A high ISO will provide you with a more ambient looking background. A lower ISO will show the background on the darker side. I use my ISO to create a desired looking ambient light setting.

I have experimented with a standard setting of lets say 1/80 and 5.6 (in manual with a flash) ... and vary the ISO from 125 to 800. I then internalize the effect that the ISO has on the ambient lighting.

I generally use 400 to 800 ISO>


Canon 5D Mark II - 24-105mm, 100mm macro, 70-200mm 2.8L
www.dancphotography.co​m (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,487 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4580
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Jan 23, 2011 14:41 |  #4

The quality of ISO400 now is very similar to ISO100 digital...so why not?!

Back when we used film in the 70's and 80's that was not true, you could easily see ISO400 film in use due to the grain. In the mid- to late-90's, ISO 400film granularity improved to the point that one could shoot ISO 400 film instead of relying upon ISO100. That was a blessing, because it made it easier to capture the ambient illumination of the church or reception hall, and photos quit having the look of the dark cave. I quit shooting anything slower than ISO400 for weddings/events, and reserved the use of ISO160 film for certain emulsions' lower contrast and great skin rendition for single portraiture, especially bridal portraiture.

ISO400 also helps to increase the number of shots that can be taken with flash before depleting the batteries, since the flash has to output less light.

And, when the ambient light is sufficient to eliminate flash, ISO400 also helps us to use a fast enough shutter speed to freeze motion for many things (except for the fastest moving little kids!)


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
antifire
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
667 posts
Joined Oct 2010
Location: Munich, Germany
     
Jan 23, 2011 15:16 |  #5

thanks for the input!



[Dan | Flickr (external link) | Facebook (external link) |www.HDLuk[COLOR="Black"].com (external link)]
Canon 5DmkII
Zeiss 2.8/21ZE | Zeiss 2.0/35ZE | Zeiss 2.0/100ZE MP | Canon 24-105L f/4 IS | Canon 70-200L f/4 IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Jan 23, 2011 16:07 |  #6

pophoto wrote in post #11698837 (external link)
A high ISO will provide you with a more ambient looking background. A lower ISO will show the background on the darker side. I use my ISO to create a desired looking ambient light setting.

I have experimented with a standard setting of lets say 1/80 and 5.6 (in manual with a flash) ... and vary the ISO from 125 to 800. I then internalize the effect that the ISO has on the ambient lighting.

I generally use 400 to 800 ISO>

Although I'm not a wedding photog, I'll agree with this statement -- I don't approach shooting people indoors as if it is a studio with all controlled even lighting, but more for a ambient look where the flash contributes enough light to fully illuminate and freeze motion but having a reasonably slow shutter speed with a higher ISO lets the ambient light give some "atmosphere".


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Jan 23, 2011 18:20 |  #7

ISO 400 requires less flash power, and image quality is much the same as ISO100.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TooManyShots
Cream of the Crop
10,203 posts
Likes: 532
Joined Jan 2008
Location: NYC
     
Jan 23, 2011 19:18 |  #8
bannedPermanent ban

As another has pointed out, is about the ambient light. I know you may not understand it but when the ISO is high enough, 400 or higher, you can allow more ambient light to fill in the frame. Why it is important? You want a good balance between the flash and ambient lights to give an even light look. The will result in either you can or can't see the background because of the ambient light there or not there.


One Imaging Photography (external link) and my Flickr (external link)
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Beachcomber ­ Joe
Senior Member
466 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Southwest Florida
     
Jan 23, 2011 19:59 |  #9

Sdiver2489 wrote in post #11698694 (external link)
In Manual mode if ISO is left on auto then it will be fixed at ISO 400.

That is true on my T1i. My 7D, on the other hand, varies the ISO up to 3200 depending on the shooting condition.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Jan 23, 2011 22:43 |  #10

Beachcomber Joe wrote in post #11700881 (external link)
That is true on my T1i. My 7D, on the other hand, varies the ISO up to 3200 depending on the shooting condition.

Even when shooting flash?


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kjonnnn
Goldmember
1,216 posts
Likes: 148
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Chicago, Illinois
     
Jan 23, 2011 22:51 |  #11

The reason is ... even though you have a slightly less noisy image at 100, at 400, you get more ambient light for the same setting. At ISO 100 the room is gonna be dark. At ISO 400, you'll get lights in the background NOT covered by the flash. Gives a more evenly lit look.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,114 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
ISO 400
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2695 guests, 149 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.