Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 23 Jan 2011 (Sunday) 15:31
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Canon Pixma Pro 9000 Mark II crooked print

 
buurin
Senior Member
Avatar
747 posts
Joined Mar 2009
     
Jan 23, 2011 15:31 |  #1

I just made my first 13x19 print on my Canon Pixma Pro 9000 Mark II

I was using Moab Natural Rag 190 paper.

Problem is the print came out majorly crooked.

Its a landscape oriented print. The top border starts out at about 1/4 inch and by the end of the 19" border its probably at 1/2 inch.

Perhaps this is a one time issue, but I don't want to keep wasting ink/paper if there is a simple way to avoid this.

The print is pretty much new (I've made less than 10 8.5x11 prints on it)


B
30D ● 5D ● Canon 24-70/2.8L
Canon 17-40/4.0L Canon 50/1.4 ● Canon 100mm/2.8 Macro ● 2xVivitar 285HVs ● 430EX ● Cybersync Flash Triggers ● AB800 ● AB400 ● Vagabond II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Jan 23, 2011 16:13 |  #2

I don't have the printer, but with my 13x19 printer, I've taken a couple different approaches. I've done a lot of "full bleed" prints (you have to turn that on in the print driver) -- you would need to work with the aspect ration where the paper is different than the original image and so you will crop the image to 13x19 to control this). Alternatively I'll print a fixed size of say 12x18 to keep the original aspect ratio or, for a "closer" composition I'd crop to, say, 12x16 or 11x14 and print one of those sizes for framing. I have a paper cutter to trim the edges.


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rw2
Goldmember
Avatar
4,201 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jun 2006
Location: North Dakota
     
Jan 23, 2011 16:31 |  #3

My guess is that the paper was not in alignment front and back.
After you line up the front edge make sure the back edge is up against the side of the printer.
I have done this once.


If you're afraid of failure ... you'll never succeed!
Rob

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ChasP505
"brain damaged old guy"
Avatar
5,566 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2006
Location: New Mexico, USA
     
Jan 23, 2011 16:41 as a reply to  @ rw2's post |  #4

For paper of that type, don't you have to rear feed it? (Or "flat feed" it)


Chas P
"It doesn't matter how you get there if you don't know where you're going!"https://photography-on-the.net …p?p=10864029#po​st10864029

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rw2
Goldmember
Avatar
4,201 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jun 2006
Location: North Dakota
     
Jan 23, 2011 19:04 |  #5

ChasP505 wrote in post #11699774 (external link)
For paper of that type, don't you have to rear feed it? (Or "flat feed" it)

Good point. I was under the assumption it was. Although it could be top fed. Use the front load feature.


If you're afraid of failure ... you'll never succeed!
Rob

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
buurin
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
747 posts
Joined Mar 2009
     
Jan 23, 2011 21:08 |  #6

Yeah this was front loaded.

The 2nd print came out perfect. I must have somehow loaded it incorrectly.

Wish I knew how so I could avoid it in the future.


B
30D ● 5D ● Canon 24-70/2.8L
Canon 17-40/4.0L Canon 50/1.4 ● Canon 100mm/2.8 Macro ● 2xVivitar 285HVs ● 430EX ● Cybersync Flash Triggers ● AB800 ● AB400 ● Vagabond II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ChasP505
"brain damaged old guy"
Avatar
5,566 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2006
Location: New Mexico, USA
     
Jan 24, 2011 09:24 |  #7

buurin wrote in post #11701267 (external link)
The 2nd print came out perfect. I must have somehow loaded it incorrectly.

Wish I knew how so I could avoid it in the future.

Take your time, check and double-check before hitting the print button. Make sure any paper guides are snug. Perhaps clean your drive rollers, if possible.


Chas P
"It doesn't matter how you get there if you don't know where you're going!"https://photography-on-the.net …p?p=10864029#po​st10864029

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BamPhoto
Goldmember
Avatar
3,175 posts
Likes: 129
Joined Sep 2005
Location: AZ-USA
     
Jan 24, 2011 19:27 |  #8

Personally the Pixma Pro 9000 mkii has to be the most difficult printer I have ever used!


Randy
My Gear List and Feedback
Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
buurin
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
747 posts
Joined Mar 2009
     
Jan 25, 2011 00:40 |  #9

cntry wrote in post #11707538 (external link)
Personally the Pixma Pro 9000 mkii has to be the most difficult printer I have ever used!

What particular issues did you have with the printer?

Which other printers have you used?

I think its a steal, especially since there are dozens of them on craigslist/forums for < $200 NEW. Granted you could argue theres a reason why there are so many being sold, but I think its just the camera + printer bundles people got for the holidays.

I've only had a handful of issues so far.


B
30D ● 5D ● Canon 24-70/2.8L
Canon 17-40/4.0L Canon 50/1.4 ● Canon 100mm/2.8 Macro ● 2xVivitar 285HVs ● 430EX ● Cybersync Flash Triggers ● AB800 ● AB400 ● Vagabond II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ChasP505
"brain damaged old guy"
Avatar
5,566 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2006
Location: New Mexico, USA
     
Jan 25, 2011 09:08 |  #10

cntry wrote in post #11707538 (external link)
Personally the Pixma Pro 9000 mkii has to be the most difficult printer I have ever used!

I think the problems people have with this printer are largely due to the inexplicable lack of documentation and online support from Canon. Why can't Canon, Epson, HP, etc. understand that the target market for consumer photo printers is the group which most needs video tutorials and other step-by-step "How Tos".


Chas P
"It doesn't matter how you get there if you don't know where you're going!"https://photography-on-the.net …p?p=10864029#po​st10864029

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BamPhoto
Goldmember
Avatar
3,175 posts
Likes: 129
Joined Sep 2005
Location: AZ-USA
     
Jan 25, 2011 09:40 |  #11

Don't get me wrong, I paid $180 shipped from POTN new for mine.

But when you have to read the manual to figure how to load paper, imho something is wrong.

I have used many HP's and have a Epson R1800, for the price I figured I would try canon.

buurin wrote in post #11709232 (external link)
What particular issues did you have with the printer?

Which other printers have you used?

I think its a steal, especially since there are dozens of them on craigslist/forums for < $200 NEW. Granted you could argue theres a reason why there are so many being sold, but I think its just the camera + printer bundles people got for the holidays.

I've only had a handful of issues so far.

I agree, canon needs to make their printers (consumer grade) a little more user friendly. That's just my opinion.

ChasP505 wrote in post #11710676 (external link)
I think the problems people have with this printer are largely due to the inexplicable lack of documentation and online support from Canon. Why can't Canon, Epson, HP, etc. understand that the target market for consumer photo printers is the group which most needs video tutorials and other step-by-step "How Tos".


Randy
My Gear List and Feedback
Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ncjohn
Senior Member
751 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Asheville NC
     
Jan 25, 2011 15:53 as a reply to  @ BamPhoto's post |  #12

My 9000MkII may be the closest to hassle-free of any piece of equipment I have. I haven't had any problems with mine except for the weird "ink may be empty" message. I just put the paper in and it prints; pretty simple. Can't complain about the docs, either. Canon support in general pretty much sucks in my opinion but their products seem excellent.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,747 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
Canon Pixma Pro 9000 Mark II crooked print
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2699 guests, 149 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.