Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 23 Jan 2011 (Sunday) 16:07
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Holly + Andrew, BRRR!!

 
Michaelmjc
not cool enough
Avatar
4,834 posts
Joined May 2004
Location: Toronto, Ontario
     
Jan 23, 2011 16:07 |  #1

Beautiful day for photos, but man was it cold. You'd never tell by the photos, she wasn't even wearing a coat in a lot of them. More can be found on my blog, www.mikeclarkeweddings​.com (external link)

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'text/html'


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'text/html'


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'text/html'


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'text/html'


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'text/html'

Yyz Design (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Red ­ Tie ­ Photography
Goldmember
Avatar
3,575 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2009
Location: San Diego
     
Jan 23, 2011 17:27 |  #2

Are you looking for C&C or just showing them?

Either way, it looks like you blew the dress in almost every photo.


Bryan
Gear List (external link)
San Diego Wedding Photography - Red Tie Photography (external link)
Red Tie Photography Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Michaelmjc
THREAD ­ STARTER
not cool enough
Avatar
4,834 posts
Joined May 2004
Location: Toronto, Ontario
     
Jan 23, 2011 17:28 |  #3

On my monitor the only thing thats blown out is the first one, which was intentional. There is detail in the highlights in every other dress shots, but thanks.


Yyz Design (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TheBrick3
Goldmember
Avatar
2,094 posts
Joined Nov 2009
Location: College Park, Md.
     
Jan 23, 2011 18:09 as a reply to  @ Michaelmjc's post |  #4

It's way blown out in the third and also overexposed in the fifth one. I also don't get the purpose of the catcus and shed shot.


1D III 5D II 5D | 580 EX II x 2
17-40L | 35L | 100L | 70-200 II | 17-35 f/2.8-f/4
Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Michaelmjc
THREAD ­ STARTER
not cool enough
Avatar
4,834 posts
Joined May 2004
Location: Toronto, Ontario
     
Jan 23, 2011 18:21 |  #5

Weird, you must all have uncalibrated monitors. Not blown out on mine, or iPad screen. Don't confuse bright with blown out.


Yyz Design (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
yagimax
Goldmember
Avatar
1,581 posts
Gallery: 14 photos
Likes: 42
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Victoria B.C. Canada
     
Jan 23, 2011 18:39 as a reply to  @ Michaelmjc's post |  #6

Very brave girl. Although I don't see any goose bumps.


Sony A7RII, FE16-35, FE35 2.8, FE90 macro

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Autonomous
Senior Member
Avatar
720 posts
Joined Dec 2008
Location: NYC
     
Jan 23, 2011 20:00 |  #7

Michaelmjc wrote in post #11700328 (external link)
Weird, you must all have uncalibrated monitors. Not blown out on mine, or iPad screen. Don't confuse bright with blown out.

its brightly blown-out :D



18-55IS, 28-105USM, 50 f/1.8, 60 f/2.8,
finally 70-200L f/4!!:cool:
never thought in a million i'd get me a 7D.bw!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
5Dmaniac
Goldmember
Avatar
1,303 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
     
Jan 23, 2011 20:21 |  #8

My monitor is calibrated and the dress is severely blown out in most of these.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Michaelmjc
THREAD ­ STARTER
not cool enough
Avatar
4,834 posts
Joined May 2004
Location: Toronto, Ontario
     
Jan 23, 2011 20:41 |  #9

I'm just very confused on where it's severely blown out, other than the top one. I do see dress details in the third shot. You do know the white stuff is snow right :lol:


Yyz Design (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PeterMcKinnon
Hatchling
4 posts
Joined Sep 2006
     
Jan 23, 2011 21:06 as a reply to  @ Michaelmjc's post |  #10

Do any of you people actually keep modern trends in mind or frequent popular, IN STYLE wedding sites and or magazines? Apparently not. Why does "Blown Out" have to be a bad thing?

Re: cactus and shed: Details people. Brides like remembering the details. Some of the most successful wedding photographers, made their names because of this very aspect. Back to the drawing board for you guys I guess

Good job michaelmjc.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BethanyC
Member
Avatar
100 posts
Joined Oct 2010
Location: Washington
     
Jan 23, 2011 22:08 |  #11

All quite excellent! I see the details, and like the bright dress. I also agree with *PeterMcKinnon Love the attention to detail. Nice work! :)


---Canon 5Dmkii * Canon 5D * 50mm 1.2 * 50mm 2.5 macro * 35f2 * 85mm 1.8 * 430exii * 580exii---
**Bethany Chamberlin (external link)**

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Michaelmjc
THREAD ­ STARTER
not cool enough
Avatar
4,834 posts
Joined May 2004
Location: Toronto, Ontario
     
Jan 23, 2011 22:40 |  #12

Thanks Bethany :)


Yyz Design (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jenirose3
Goldmember
Avatar
1,268 posts
Joined Jun 2006
     
Jan 24, 2011 09:17 |  #13

I can't comment on the blow outs as my monitor at work is uncalibrated. But I can comment on the details. The shed? Ok maybe. The half-dead cactus? I thought it was an ashtray at first glance. If my wedding photog came to me with those detail shots I would be like, "HUH?"


Jeni
Canon 5D|20D|L Glass|Primes|ABs|580ex​II|pocketwizards
Looking for: Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM
http://www.lolaandme.c​om (external link), http://www.provocateur​photography.com (external link), http://www.modelmayhem​.com/provocateurphotog​raphy (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,258 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
Holly + Andrew, BRRR!!
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Monkeytoes
1373 guests, 176 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.