Hello all,
Looking to see if there is a better crop to this pic. Also any other suggestions welcome.
thanks.
asty80 Senior Member 591 posts Likes: 54 Joined Aug 2008 Location: Pune, India via Bear, DE, US More info | Jan 25, 2011 21:30 | #1 Hello all, Canon 5D Mark iii, Canon 40D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Crocodile101 Member 186 posts Joined May 2009 Location: Westchester, IL More info | Jan 25, 2011 21:39 | #2 Permanent bannothing to see below. remove or retake without the bottom clutter You don't take a photograph, you make it. Ansel Adams.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MJoliat Mostly Lurking 15 posts Joined Jan 2011 More info | I agree. It's almost like the items in the foreground are supposed to be the subject and you just happened to catch the bridge in the background. Everyday is a great day when you wake up looking at the green side of the grass!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
davidcoelho Member 116 posts Joined Dec 2010 More info | Jan 26, 2011 17:50 | #4 My eyes are confused with the foreground. I would remove it. Or, if possible, shoot the bridge through the pipe on the left. Photography Enthusiast - shoot, shoot, shoot
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 26, 2011 18:36 | #5 Agree with the above...foreground is too busy. If you can reshoot, go forward and to the right by where the ropes are attached to the pier. Get a clean foreground. If not then crop out all the major distractions. -- Image Editing OK --
LOG IN TO REPLY |
asty80 THREAD STARTER Senior Member 591 posts Likes: 54 Joined Aug 2008 Location: Pune, India via Bear, DE, US More info | Jan 26, 2011 18:51 | #6 thanks for the comments, all! Canon 5D Mark iii, Canon 40D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Spike44 Goldmember 2,155 posts Likes: 3 Joined Dec 2007 More info | Jan 27, 2011 08:29 | #7 Guess I am alone but I took the reverse approach - I cropped off a bit of the sky, straightened the building on left and pumped up the exposure in the foreground, sharpened the bottom only to bring out the nice textures.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dynamic03 Senior Member 341 posts Joined Jan 2010 More info | Jan 27, 2011 11:33 | #8 The crop works much better, great capture. Canon 5D Mark II | 135mm L | 24-70mm L | 100mm f/2.8 macro | 50mm f/1.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Flo Gimmie Some Lovin 44,987 posts Likes: 16 Joined Jul 2007 Location: Nanaimo,B.C. More info | If this is nearby, I would revisit for sure, now you know what you want to frame you're a great friend, but if Zombies chase us, I am tripping you.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
asty80 THREAD STARTER Senior Member 591 posts Likes: 54 Joined Aug 2008 Location: Pune, India via Bear, DE, US More info | Jan 27, 2011 21:13 | #10 Spike- thanks for that version. Liked it. Canon 5D Mark iii, Canon 40D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CrystalWPhotography Senior Member 500 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jan 2011 Location: PA More info | Jan 28, 2011 10:26 | #11 Looks much better crop, except for the curved pipping on the left side. Crystal
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ChadR. Member 214 posts Joined Oct 2010 More info | Jan 28, 2011 11:42 | #12 Clone that out =) They say you are what you eat. Funny, I don't remember eating a sexy beast.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CallumPhoto Senior Member 661 posts Joined Dec 2010 More info | Jan 29, 2011 00:47 | #13 |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1589 guests, 138 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||