KenjiS wrote in post #12356733
^- its still a good shot, the light might have worked against you in that anyways..a ND filter and exposure blending would have helped IMHO
Thanks! Unfortunately, I don't know what any of that means... In due time.
I've heard GREAT things about the 3100, many say its not far off from the D90(which will be my next body).
monk3y wrote in post #12356751
yes AFAIK, in fact I think almost everybody says its better than all of Nikon's 50mm lenses

but then if you really want 50mm...wait for the new 50mm f/1.8.
if the 35mm is an indication, that lens should be awesome as well

Well, I've been thinking about it, most of my automotive shots were shot at well under 50mm, probably closer to the 20-30mm range, I think the 35 would be a much better fit. Sounds like I found my fixed wide max aperture lens.
The rest... now that still a problem. I'm really starting to look hard at a "mid-zoom" camera, for instance a 16-85, or a 24-120, or a 18-105. What do you guys think about lenses in that range? And what kind of image quality can I expect out of a lens in that range in comparison to my current lenses?