Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Nikon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 05 Feb 2010 (Friday) 20:14
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Got a Nikon? Share your thoughts and photos here or ask a question! (II)

 
this thread is locked
KenjiS
"Holy crap its long!"
Avatar
21,439 posts
Gallery: 622 photos
Likes: 3076
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY
     
May 05, 2011 23:52 |  #1951

^- its still a good shot, the light might have worked against you in that anyways..a ND filter and exposure blending would have helped IMHO

In that case i was lucky thats all...Thats on a D3100 BTW

I do gotta admit the sensor in the D3100 is a freaking peach, i think it has more dynamic range or something than my 7D, im just noticing a lot of stuff at low ISOs


Gear, New and Old! RAW Club Member
Wanted: 70-200. Time and good health
Deviantart (external link)
Flickr (This is where my good stuff is!) (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
monk3y
Totally Saturated
Avatar
46,207 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 70
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Cloud and Honey
     
May 05, 2011 23:56 |  #1952

Max713 wrote in post #12356721 (external link)
Great point, would anybody say the 35 is a better lens than the 50 other than focal length?

yes AFAIK, in fact I think almost everybody says its better than all of Nikon's 50mm lenses :lol: but then if you really want 50mm...wait for the new 50mm f/1.8.

if the 35mm is an indication, that lens should be awesome as well :D


www.monk3y.com (external link) | My GEAR

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Max713
Junior Member
27 posts
Joined May 2011
Location: Albany, OR
     
May 05, 2011 23:59 |  #1953

KenjiS wrote in post #12356733 (external link)
^- its still a good shot, the light might have worked against you in that anyways..a ND filter and exposure blending would have helped IMHO

Thanks! Unfortunately, I don't know what any of that means... In due time.

I've heard GREAT things about the 3100, many say its not far off from the D90(which will be my next body).

monk3y wrote in post #12356751 (external link)
yes AFAIK, in fact I think almost everybody says its better than all of Nikon's 50mm lenses :lol: but then if you really want 50mm...wait for the new 50mm f/1.8.

if the 35mm is an indication, that lens should be awesome as well :D

Well, I've been thinking about it, most of my automotive shots were shot at well under 50mm, probably closer to the 20-30mm range, I think the 35 would be a much better fit. Sounds like I found my fixed wide max aperture lens.
The rest... now that still a problem. I'm really starting to look hard at a "mid-zoom" camera, for instance a 16-85, or a 24-120, or a 18-105. What do you guys think about lenses in that range? And what kind of image quality can I expect out of a lens in that range in comparison to my current lenses?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KenjiS
"Holy crap its long!"
Avatar
21,439 posts
Gallery: 622 photos
Likes: 3076
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY
     
May 05, 2011 23:59 |  #1954

It depends, Personally i love the 35mm but i still wish it was a little longer

I tend to go for longer lenses...The 35mm is a very good handy lens tho


Gear, New and Old! RAW Club Member
Wanted: 70-200. Time and good health
Deviantart (external link)
Flickr (This is where my good stuff is!) (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
May 06, 2011 00:15 |  #1955

KenjiS wrote in post #12356772 (external link)
It depends, Personally i love the 35mm but i still wish it was a little longer

Take two steps closer, or use a 50mm and take two steps back!


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
anlenke
Senior Member
Avatar
575 posts
Joined Mar 2011
     
May 06, 2011 00:24 |  #1956

Max713 wrote in post #12356721 (external link)
Great point, would anybody say the 35 is a better lens than the 50 other than focal length?

It depends which 50mm. The 35mm is sharper than the 50mm 1.8D, and IMO the 50mm 1.4D, the 50mm 1.4G is a little better build quality, but the sharpness is about the same at 1.8 really. The bokeh of the 50mm 1.4G is probably the best because it has an extra aperture blade, but not worth the cost difference for most. I just sold my 50mm 1.4D to make space for the new 50mm 1.8G, which likely will be better than all of them, with the exception of losing that little bit of aperture to the 1.4G. I'm not terribly concerned, especially with the price difference. I think the 35mm 1.8 is built better than the 1.8D (and will AF on your body, and is very close to the 50mm 1.4G.)


Hi. I'm Anton.
Personal work: Flickr (external link)
Gear, for those who want to know.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
peterbj7
Goldmember
3,123 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2007
Location: A Caribbean island in Belize and occasionally UK
     
May 06, 2011 00:28 |  #1957

Why are there so many similar Nikkor lenses, and do the letters "D" and "G" mean anything as such?


5D & 7D (both gripped), 24-105L, 100-400L, 15-85, 50 f1.8, Tamron 28-75, Sigma 12-24, G10, EX-Z55 & U/W housing, A1+10 lenses, tripods, lighting gear, etc. etc.
"I prefer radio to television. The pictures are better"

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
anlenke
Senior Member
Avatar
575 posts
Joined Mar 2011
     
May 06, 2011 00:31 |  #1958

Max713 wrote in post #12356771 (external link)
The rest... now that still a problem. I'm really starting to look hard at a "mid-zoom" camera, for instance a 16-85, or a 24-120, or a 18-105. What do you guys think about lenses in that range? And what kind of image quality can I expect out of a lens in that range in comparison to my current lenses?

The 24-120 I don't suspect you'll be happy with; very expensive, and a 24 is a 36 on the D60 or D90; not wide enough I would think. The 18-105 is going to be a step up from your lenses you have currently, and I would think probably would cover your needs pretty well. The 16-85 is nice, optically a step up again from the 18-105, but only get that if you're really using the 18 on your 18-55 a lot. If you're really in the 20-30 range, I don't think it's worth the extra money.

I've got a gripped D90 with an 18-105 if you'd like to purchase it :D


Hi. I'm Anton.
Personal work: Flickr (external link)
Gear, for those who want to know.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
monk3y
Totally Saturated
Avatar
46,207 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 70
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Cloud and Honey
     
May 06, 2011 00:31 |  #1959

tim wrote in post #12356855 (external link)
Take two steps closer, or use a 50mm and take two steps back!

I prefer the 35mm and then 2 3 steps forward..than 50mm then backwards..there are times where you just can't go backwards.

with wide we can always crop a bit afterwards :lol: reason why I sold my 2nd 50mm hehe


www.monk3y.com (external link) | My GEAR

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
anlenke
Senior Member
Avatar
575 posts
Joined Mar 2011
     
May 06, 2011 00:33 |  #1960

peterbj7 wrote in post #12356900 (external link)
Why are there so many similar Nikkor lenses, and do the letters "D" and "G" mean anything as such?

Yeah, the D lenses are digital lenses that have aperture rings on them still so you can manually stop down (and I hang on to so I can use them with my older film cameras). The newer "G" rings only have the focus ring on them...


Hi. I'm Anton.
Personal work: Flickr (external link)
Gear, for those who want to know.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
anlenke
Senior Member
Avatar
575 posts
Joined Mar 2011
     
May 06, 2011 00:33 |  #1961

monk3y wrote in post #12356911 (external link)
I prefer the 35mm and then 2 3 steps forward..than 50mm then backwards..there are times where you just can't go backwards.

with wide we can always crop a bit afterwards :lol: reason why I sold my 2nd 50mm hehe

Like the new signature :D


Hi. I'm Anton.
Personal work: Flickr (external link)
Gear, for those who want to know.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
monk3y
Totally Saturated
Avatar
46,207 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 70
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Cloud and Honey
     
May 06, 2011 00:43 |  #1962

anlenke wrote in post #12356923 (external link)
Like the new signature :D

of course that last one is just wishful thinking :lol:

if I ever have funds to buy that 800mm... I would pair it up with the D3x..and shoot in DX mode with 1.4TC and get 1680mm :lol:

yeah dream on


www.monk3y.com (external link) | My GEAR

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
anlenke
Senior Member
Avatar
575 posts
Joined Mar 2011
     
May 06, 2011 00:50 |  #1963

monk3y wrote in post #12356960 (external link)
of course that last one is just wishful thinking :lol:

if I ever have funds to buy that 800mm... I would pair it up with the D3x..and shoot in DX mode with 1.4TC and get 1680mm :lol:

yeah dream on

I was going to ask "what on Earth would you shoot with that thing?", but plainly, you can't shoot anything on earth, it'll have to be farther :)
I have a 1200mm mirror lens I've used twice, it's nuts. Cool for some things though.


Hi. I'm Anton.
Personal work: Flickr (external link)
Gear, for those who want to know.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KenjiS
"Holy crap its long!"
Avatar
21,439 posts
Gallery: 622 photos
Likes: 3076
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY
     
May 06, 2011 00:50 |  #1964

tim wrote in post #12356855 (external link)
Take two steps closer, or use a 50mm and take two steps back!

True enough, i do have situations where getting a bit farther back or closer is hard, IE here i was in a booth at a restaurant and my 50mm is too darn long

IMAGE: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v170/scifiguy1012/Photography/IMG_4824.jpg

Gear, New and Old! RAW Club Member
Wanted: 70-200. Time and good health
Deviantart (external link)
Flickr (This is where my good stuff is!) (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
monk3y
Totally Saturated
Avatar
46,207 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 70
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Cloud and Honey
     
May 06, 2011 00:54 |  #1965

anlenke wrote in post #12356999 (external link)
I was going to ask "what on Earth would you shoot with that thing?", but plainly, you can't shoot anything on earth, it'll have to be farther :)
I have a 1200mm mirror lens I've used twice, it's nuts. Cool for some things though.

where? can I use a mirror lens on a tripod? I would want to shoot the sun with that lens on sunset :lol: :mad:

I know mirror lens are cheap but are they good? :lol::lol:


www.monk3y.com (external link) | My GEAR

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

975,790 views & 0 likes for this thread, 268 members have posted to it and it is followed by 3 members.
Got a Nikon? Share your thoughts and photos here or ask a question! (II)
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Nikon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Thunderstream
1830 guests, 114 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.