Peacefield wrote in post #11742032
I know to do it and how to control it, but I don't understand the concept behind it. I like to expose the scene so that ambient is about two stops dark. What does it matter if I achieve that through shutter speed, aperture, ISO, or anything else? If the scene is metering two stops dark (and I'm using ETTL, btw) does it really impact the quality of the image if I did that through a wider aperture vs. a faster shutter speed?
Let's assume there is a certain level of ambient light, and the use of ISO200 and 1/100 f/4 captures 2 unit of background light on film. We have a flash, and it outputs light so that at ISO200 with f/4 results in the sensor seeing 4 units of light, and that four units of light constitues 'proper exposure'. So our background is underexposed by 2 units of light while the main subject is properly exposed. Stated in terms of EV (light values) the subject is 0EV and the background is -1EV. Now let's analyze how we might try to alter the balance of subject:background brightness (not an exhaustive list of possible ways to handle, but just a few!)...
- We can speed up the shutter to 1/200. This causes the background to be further underexposed by -1EV. Since the flash (which is faster than 1/200) outputs the same amount of light on the subject, relative to the subject (which is at 0EV) the background is now at -2EV
- We can change aperture to f/5.6. This causes the background to be further underexposed by another -1EV. The ETTL flash metering sees the less light, too, so it asks the flash to output more light (+1EV) which offsets the slower aperture, so the subject is still exposed to 0EV. But now the background is at -2EV, relative to the main subject.
- We can change the ISO to ISO100. This causes the background to be further underexposed by another -1EV. The ETTL flash metering sees the less light, too, so it asks the flash to output more light (+1EV) which offsets the slower ISO, so the subject is still exposed to 0EV. But now the background is at -2EV, relative to the main subject.
In scenario 1, the shutter speed was made faster. So things in motion, which would be blurred when recorded by ambient light, would be less blurred.
In scenario 2, the aperture was made smaller. This increases DOF. Motion stopping is not altered (shutter speed is the same).
In scenario 3, the ISO was made slower. No change to aperture or shutter speed. No change to DOF, no change to motion stopping.
In this example, 'quality of the image' is not impacted at all. But if we had a situation where f/11 became f/16, the quality would suffer because of the increased diffraction caused at very small apertures. Or if we had f/4 become f/2.8, we might have less contrast at the wide open aperture, and the MTF score of the lens suffers as a result.