Rate the Photo Above You

Please Rate the Photo Above You (writen in the rule > The rules are simple Rate the photo above you and give it a score out of ten)

Also if we start to cross comment/Rate ... photo like this one (just below) will be forgotten (not nice for the OP which is still waiting for a rating)

Am i wrong ?

bartc wrote in post #17137219

IMG NOTICE: [NOT AN IMAGE URL, NOT RENDERED INLINE]

I like it, it's not over post processed (i'm not a photoshop guy ), like the colors too, and i like the composition and attitude of the model an very easy 8.5/10

I will not post a photo, because someone need to RATE the bird above me (from underd0g) and post a photo to get back on track

7.5/10 for underd0g's bird. Love the colour.

All images are great. 9 out of 10.

imagecolorist wrote in post #17139955
All images are great. 9 out of 10.

Good one

Reservoir Dog wrote in post #17139837
Please Rate the Photo Above You (writen in the rule > The rules are simple Rate the photo above you and give it a score out of ten)

Also if we start to cross comment/Rate ... photo like this one (just below) will be forgotten (not nice for the OP which is still waiting for a rating)

Am i wrong ?

You're absolutely right, I'm a newbie here but that's no excuse for not following instructions. Hey, I hate reading manuals, which is reflected in my photography.

But I'd give the seahorses an 8 simply because the composition seems just a tad off. maybe because it was taken to get those seahorses on the fly.

Good catch Reservoir Dog.


.

underd0g wrote in post #17140330
You're absolutely right, I'm a newbie here but that's no excuse for not following instructions. Hey, I hate reading manuals, which is reflected in my photography.

But I'd give the seahorses an 8 simply because the composition seems just a tad off. maybe because it was taken to get those seahorses on the fly.

Good catch Reservoir Dog.


.

Lol no worries, keep up in this thread and this forum.
This is a very nice place

JackoNZ wrote in post #17139930
7.5/10 for underd0g's bird. Love the colour.

2/10, looks like a snap shot. Photo is flat, blown out spot near top right really bothers me. Photo doesn't really do anything to me.

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/oPvQ​ft

slickooz wrote in post #17140524
2/10, looks like a snap shot. Photo is flat, blown out spot near top right really bothers me. Photo doesn't really do anything to me.

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/oPvQ​ft Surveillance by slickoooz, on Flickr

Really cool shot. Very interesting and dramatic. Love the processing and the composition. The noise/graininess adds to it.

8.5/10

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/oQct​J8

jack880 wrote in post #17140887
Really cool shot. Very interesting and dramatic. Love the processing and the composition. The noise/graininess adds to it.

8.5/10

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/oQct​J8 Flash Photographer by J_Q_H, on Flickr

Not sure how I feel about it. 7.5/10 because the color balance is way out of control IMO. Also don't really think the zooming effect was entirely necessary for the shot. It adds too much motion to a relatively static subject. Not a bad photo, but probably not your best either.

HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

New to this forum, so I don't know how to quote posts, and I am also way out of my league. But I'd give the last one a 9/10. I love the soft colors and the way all the curves - hand, hips, sweater collar - complement each other. I would crop out the lamps and the potted plant, though.

This is a shot from a year or two ago. Bear in mind that I am definitely an amateur. xD

eLiberty wrote in post #17143265
New to this forum, so I don't know how to quote posts, and I am also way out of my league. But I'd give the last one a 9/10. I love the soft colors and the way all the curves - hand, hips, sweater collar - complement each other. I would crop out the lamps and the potted plant, though.

This is a shot from a year or two ago. Bear in mind that I am definitely an amateur. xD

The colors are nice and rich, but the "pose" is all off. Animals tend to be fairly expressive, much like humans, so a shot from the back isn't that great if there isn't a dynamic background. The focus is a little soft, too, for the amount of light available.

5.5/10.

This is from my first concert shoot. Minimal light, barebones equipment.

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/oRLq​iN

EagleMorph wrote in post #17143305
The colors are nice and rich, but the "pose" is all off. Animals tend to be fairly expressive, much like humans, so a shot from the back isn't that great if there isn't a dynamic background. The focus is a little soft, too, for the amount of light available.

5.5/10.

This is from my first concert shoot. Minimal light, barebones equipment.

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/oRLq​iN

Identity X by achiappazzi, on Flickr

Not bad, the picture definitely has some good amount of mood to it.
Minimalistic in terms of lighting, but it works.

7.4/10

Just a casual headshot.

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/p76g​wN

Van Gogh wrote in post #17143778
Just a casual headshot.

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/p76g​wN Noterworthy_fashion_37 by hakob1, on Flickr[/IMG]

I like it but I guess being uber critical I'd say the pose is a little odd and the lighting a little flat, but its not bad - 7/10

One from Saturday...

MIME changed to 'text/html' | Content warning: script

I like the photo a lot. The pose is good and I personally like the bit of shade/ sunlight. But I think some people might find it distracting. 8/10


Here is a very raw photo of my son right after he was born. I am upset about cutting the toes but I was very emotional hard to compose in this situation.

electricme wrote in post #17143972
I like the photo a lot. The pose is good and I personally like the bit of shade/ sunlight. But I think some people might find it distracting. 8/10


Here is a very raw photo of my son right after he was born. I am upset about cutting the toes but I was very emotional hard to compose in this situation.

Well this picture is more for memory purposes I assume, as such, its easily 10/10.
From e technical standpoint though, its not a 10/10, that's all I will say. But I would not dare to give less then 10/10 in this case.

Another portrait.

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/oRRx​mi