Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 01 Feb 2011 (Tuesday) 19:05
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Bridals

 
B.Miller
Senior Member
Avatar
802 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Lexington, SC
     
Feb 01, 2011 19:05 |  #1

A couple shots of a future bride:

1.

IMAGE: http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5177/5402238042_ef3ac5ffaa_z.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …/47484168@N07/5​402238042/  (external link)
Courtney Bridal (external link) by Bryant Miller (external link), on Flickr

2.
IMAGE: http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5020/5401636363_3964c1c93f_z.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …/47484168@N07/5​401636363/  (external link)
Courtney Bridal (external link) by Bryant Miller (external link), on Flickr

3.
IMAGE: http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5095/5402232954_77e9bf0ce1_z.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …/47484168@N07/5​402232954/  (external link)
Courtney Bridal (external link) by Bryant Miller (external link), on Flickr

4.
IMAGE: http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5089/5361789588_206739ea27_z.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …/47484168@N07/5​361789588/  (external link)
IMG_4127-2 (external link) by Bryant Miller (external link), on Flickr


Will be printing #1 for display at the reception.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
B.Miller
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
802 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Lexington, SC
     
Feb 03, 2011 16:26 |  #2

nobody? lol




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,806 posts
Gallery: 512 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 13902
Joined Dec 2006
     
Feb 03, 2011 16:35 |  #3

Your zenfolio link doesnt work. I was hoping to see some more examples of your work. I gotta say these dont thrill me that much. In the first the tree on the left is distracting, and honestly the whole bridge thing seems to be drawing attention away from the bride. I would want to see more of her and less background. In the third and last shots she is standing square to the camera which tends to make her look larger than she is, especially in a big white dress. The background on the last is just way too cluttered and overwhelming, especially given how little of the frame the main subject fills. I think you are close to some good work, but with a little care you can do better.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Svetlana
Goldmember
Avatar
3,357 posts
Likes: 11
Joined May 2008
Location: Calgary, AB
     
Feb 03, 2011 17:01 |  #4

I agree with the comments above...posing and composition could definitely use improvement. Also watch your lighting (esp in first 3 photos), she's squinting. Viel could have been used to hide the arms and maker her look slimmer, there's a thread on here with posing techniques for larger people - it was a huge help for me at some point of time!


Canon 7D, 5Dmk2, 70-200mm f/2.8L II IS, Canon 50 1.2L, 35 1.4L, 85 1.8, Canon 16-35L, Canon 100 2.8L IS Macro, Speedlight 580EX II x 2, 430 EX, enthusiasm.:D http://svetlanayanova.​com/ (external link)

Join me on Facebook (external link)! :)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PeaceFire
Goldmember
Avatar
2,281 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Glendale, AZ - Chico, CA - Duluth, MN
     
Feb 03, 2011 17:04 |  #5

Your bride doesn't really pull the attention to her. She looks a little stiff and uncomfortable. You could have cracked some jokes or just chatted as you shot and caught some "real" moments to loosen her up a bit. The pictures are all cute but not blowing me away.

Although I will disagree with gonzogolf on the last one- it's my favorite and I think a wonderful picture. But really the only one out of the bunch that I would personally use.

Your colors and processing are nice in all of the colored images, so good job there! In the black and white I think a little more contrast would make the image pop more. As it is now, it's a little dull.


My Gear List / My Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
glasshouse
Member
93 posts
Joined Jan 2011
     
Feb 03, 2011 19:11 |  #6
bannedPermanent ban

i agree with most of the other comments... but to cut you some slack, you had a challenging subject in terms of your options of poses and such - that's where a real pro shines though, is know how to pose challenging subjects or make up for flaws like long noses, etc.

I like #1 pretty good though... but dont let the bride's arm "hang" like that, bring her elbow up, that also separates her body from her arm and slims that whole area, and provides a triangular base to the composition.

Here was a non-thin bride; look how I had her old the keepsake:

IMAGE: http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5124/5323143156_b3f4fb485b_b.jpg

Thanks



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
B.Miller
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
802 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Lexington, SC
     
Feb 03, 2011 20:00 |  #7

Thanks for the CC guys. She chose the bridge, hence why I'm not cropped in more. This has been my hardest wedding yet, dealing with a very close minded and head strong brides mother. Doesn't make the job any easier, that's for sure.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Red ­ Tie ­ Photography
Goldmember
Avatar
3,575 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2009
Location: San Diego
     
Feb 03, 2011 21:02 |  #8

Hey Bryant, thanks for posting. I think these could be much stronger with a bit of tweaking on the posing. For example:

1. I would bring her shoulder that is facing away from the camera (her left shoulder) a bit more towards you. I think a 45 degree angle works best, and this is just a bit to far out. Also, try to move the bouquet a bit more away from the body. I have learned, if you can bend a joint, bend it. Having straight arms really makes the image static. If you drag the veil a bit over her right shoulder (the one closest to the camera) you will also be able to make it more appealing. No matter the size of the person (man or woman) showing huge flats of skin makes them look bigger.

2. Same with the posing I listed above, but here the biggest culprit is lighting. It could have used some fill flash, or (my favorite recently) a reflector to either bring in light or to diffuse it coming down.

3. Straight on to the camera and not appealing. In a situation like this, I like to try to keep it very symmetrical, and bringing the veil over her right shoulder would bring a bit more into the photo.

4. Here I think this is your strongest one, and you are almost there with the posing. I have found that when you are doing a pose like this, you have to really accentuate the pose. Tell her to put her weight on her back foot pointing out to the outside of the sidewalk and her front foot pointing towards you. Then tell her to REALLY pop her hip out. It is very easy for this pose to be muted with a big white dress (as most wedding dresses are) and although it may seem extreme, it shows better in the photos.

You got the WB and exposure right, so it is obvious you have the basics down. All you need to do is get a bit stronger in posing, and that comes with a lot of practice. Keep it up!


Bryan
Gear List (external link)
San Diego Wedding Photography - Red Tie Photography (external link)
Red Tie Photography Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
B.Miller
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
802 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Lexington, SC
     
Feb 04, 2011 06:49 |  #9

Thanks for the tips Bryan, always appreciated.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
glasshouse
Member
93 posts
Joined Jan 2011
     
Feb 04, 2011 09:52 |  #10
bannedPermanent ban

Red Tie Photography wrote in post #11772979 (external link)
4. Here I think this is your strongest one, and you are almost there with the posing.!

Seriously? i totally disagree. One of the best tips you can give someone, is to never, EVER, pose anyone except the thinnest of models "square" to the camera like this. This photo also has a very static composition, there's no diagonal lines, no crash symmetery, no triangular based, nothing - it's definitely a snapshot. See my comments above also on not letting the arm just "hang" at the side like that - it makes her look even heavier.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Red ­ Tie ­ Photography
Goldmember
Avatar
3,575 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2009
Location: San Diego
     
Feb 04, 2011 12:29 |  #11

glasshouse wrote in post #11775597 (external link)
Seriously? i totally disagree. One of the best tips you can give someone, is to never, EVER, pose anyone except the thinnest of models "square" to the camera like this. This photo also has a very static composition, there's no diagonal lines, no crash symmetery, no triangular based, nothing - it's definitely a snapshot. See my comments above also on not letting the arm just "hang" at the side like that - it makes her look even heavier.

Ok, we differ in opinion. I dindt say this was a perfect shot (and adding tweaks like you mentioned) would make it stronger. I feel it has the most potential if he shot it again.


Bryan
Gear List (external link)
San Diego Wedding Photography - Red Tie Photography (external link)
Red Tie Photography Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
glasshouse
Member
93 posts
Joined Jan 2011
     
Feb 04, 2011 12:50 |  #12
bannedPermanent ban

Ok, fair enough. Thanks




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,436 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
Bridals
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Nat Zagninski
802 guests, 191 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.