Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Transportation 
Thread started 01 Feb 2011 (Tuesday) 22:39
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

More trucks in the dark.

 
lblaod
Member
35 posts
Joined Jun 2007
     
Feb 22, 2011 12:32 |  #16

robertwsimpson wrote in post #11769072 (external link)
you've got the wrong angle to your subject for a nice panning shot. As you move with the cab of the truck, your perspective changes with the trailer, making it blurry. In my opinion, you should rethink what you're going for.

Great shots, although they are blurry. I agree with robertwsimpson about the angle to your subject. Perhaps try "moving your feet" to get another perspective :lol:




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jsmonet
Member
147 posts
Joined Mar 2009
Location: So Cal
     
Feb 22, 2011 12:40 |  #17

NicholasP wrote in post #11892479 (external link)
Pretty outrageous to recommend "browser calibration."

I must have wasted a couple hundred dollars on my calibration suite and another grand on this monitor.

no matter.


i have a camera. it takes nice pictures.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nicklk
Member
Avatar
89 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Englewood, CO
     
Feb 22, 2011 13:35 |  #18

Is there a way to calibrate the noise out of a photo, through my browser?


Canon EOS 70D, EOS 40D | EF 50mm f/1.8, EF 28-135 f/3.5-5.6 IS USM, EF 70-200mm f/4L | Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 DC HSM Art | DJi Phantom 3 Professional | GoPro 360 Rig

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MSIGuy
Senior Member
Avatar
369 posts
Joined Mar 2008
     
Feb 22, 2011 18:49 |  #19

nicklk wrote in post #11892886 (external link)
Is there a way to calibrate the noise out of a photo, through my browser?

I'm pretty sure there's an extension in Chrome for that.

I'm still trying to find one to calibrate my browser... All the photos in this thread look underexposed to me, stupid Firefox, I'm going to go try IE.


Some cameras, some lenses, plenty of gaffer's tape and beer.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lblaod
Member
35 posts
Joined Jun 2007
     
Feb 22, 2011 19:10 |  #20

nicklk wrote in post #11892886 (external link)
Is there a way to calibrate the noise out of a photo, through my browser?

Not sure if that's possible...
OP, have you tried using noise ninja or LR to remove noise to decrease the levels? You might lose some details, but the end result would be less noise. There's various tutorials on how to remove noise. Also, make sure to shoot in raw! :lol:




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
njcfm
Member
Avatar
59 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2010
     
Feb 22, 2011 19:30 |  #21

I can see all of the bars on that calibration chart..

pics still look underexposed, not to mention that half of them have the subject cut off in someway.
practice makes perfect!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
davie ­ rogue
Member
Avatar
39 posts
Joined Oct 2010
     
Feb 22, 2011 20:07 |  #22

Wow, lots of wildly varying camera settings, with very little shot success and nothing really interesting compositionally.

Seems like the content in this thread might be better suited to a C+C / advice thread, but instead the original poster is just argumentative and rebutting any pointers. Not a very good attitude to have :(




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MSIGuy
Senior Member
Avatar
369 posts
Joined Mar 2008
     
Feb 22, 2011 20:45 |  #23

davie rogue wrote in post #11895342 (external link)
Wow, lots of wildly varying camera settings, with very little shot success and nothing really interesting compositionally.

That's okay though, we all had to start somewhere. Practice makes perfect right? :D


Some cameras, some lenses, plenty of gaffer's tape and beer.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nofreee
Member
34 posts
Joined Nov 2010
     
Feb 22, 2011 21:15 |  #24

MSIGuy wrote in post #11895573 (external link)
That's okay though, we all had to start somewhere. Practice makes perfect right? :D

Good advice! :grin:




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosGuy
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop, R.I.P.
Avatar
75,941 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 2611
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Middle of Michigan
     
Feb 22, 2011 21:23 |  #25

jigelow wrote in post #11892378 (external link)
Hello. I am new here and find this very interesting. I see you suggest calibrating my browser.

Is it a special version of Internet Explorer? I cannot find how to change browser calibration. Should I use a different browser? Netscape?

I posted a link, but maybe this will make more sense to you: WEB BROWSER COLOR MANAGEMENT TUTORIAL (external link)
http://www.gballard.ne​t …embeddedJPEGpro​files.html (external link)
And see my comment to MSIGuy, below.

Cesium wrote in post #11892429 (external link)
What? There is a technique for underexposing?

Here's just one example:
http://www.wonderhowto​.com …o-night-photoshop-214630/ (external link)
Like color balance, the "correct" exposure may not be the "right" exposure for a particular image. But like anything else, whatever you do, someone will love it, someone will hate it, & the vast majority will just yawn & go on to something else.

NicholasP wrote in post #11892479 (external link)
Pretty outrageous to recommend "browser calibration."

You think that all 250,000+ members here are already aware of it?

lblaod wrote in post #11892533 (external link)
Great shots, although they are blurry. I agree with robertwsimpson about the angle to your subject. Perhaps try "moving your feet" to get another perspective

Reread the first post. The majority of the subject in the shots is supposed to be blurred. I've included other shots that didn't work out very well for me, but might work out for someone else. For instance, you liked some of them, but they're still not what I'd like to get. So I'll keep at it.

MSIGuy wrote in post #11894841 (external link)
I'm pretty sure there's an extension in Chrome for that.

I'm still trying to find one to calibrate my browser... All the photos in this thread look underexposed to me, stupid Firefox, I'm going to go try IE.

A dark image isn't necessarily underexposed. Maybe it was done for a purpose?

See the WEB BROWSER link above. You don't have to "calibrate your browser". You need to use a browser that recognizes embedded ICC profiles.
Firefox is one of the good ones. Except for the IE9(beta), IE wasn't the last time I checked.

davie rogue wrote in post #11895342 (external link)
Wow, lots of wildly varying camera settings, with very little shot success and nothing really interesting compositionally.

Yup, light levels were changing. And I'd rather shoot something difficult like this than something easy.

Seems like the content in this thread might be better suited to a C+C / advice thread, but instead the original poster is just argumentative and rebutting any pointers. Not a very good attitude to have

Did I ask for C&C?
I posted the purpose of taking the shots, "the idea is to get the front sharp & the rest with some motion blur." This thread is just another 'step on the road' to getting them.


FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1600 pixels on any side.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SonicZoom
Senior Member
Avatar
321 posts
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Los Angeles, CA
     
Feb 22, 2011 21:48 |  #26

Too dark for my taste, and the location isn't the best either considering it looks residential. Push the ISO, shoot more during the day, or become a ninja with panning to make them brighter. 1 is close, but I don't think in any situation these are appropriate, even for "day for night" photography. Try those techniques, and look for a different location... say an industrial area, and I think the results will be MUCH better. Keep it up, practice practice practice, you'll get there.


Clint Davis
http://clintdavis.net (external link)
http://clintdavis.net/​blog (external link)
5DmkII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
davie ­ rogue
Member
Avatar
39 posts
Joined Oct 2010
     
Feb 22, 2011 22:01 |  #27

PhotosGuy wrote in post #11895827 (external link)
Did I ask for C&C?
I posted the purpose of taking the shots, "the idea is to get the front sharp & the rest with some motion blur." This thread is just another 'step on the road' to getting them.

Thats my point. If you took the advice of other successful photographers on board instead of this bad attitude of blind refusal, maybe next time you go out you'll be closer to your target.

But as they say, practice makes perfect! :D




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NicholasP
Senior Member
Avatar
382 posts
Joined Jan 2009
     
Feb 22, 2011 22:29 |  #28

Can you show me how to calibrate my web browsers? I am using Chrome primarily. Secondary is Safari.

I am using a Mac Pro with a calibrated monitor. Perhaps I need a better computer.


Nikon D3s Crew

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jigelow
Mostly Lurking
10 posts
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Ukraine
     
Feb 22, 2011 22:34 |  #29

PhotosGuy wrote in post #11895827 (external link)
I posted a link, but maybe this will make more sense to you: WEB BROWSER COLOR MANAGEMENT TUTORIAL (external link)
http://www.gballard.ne​t …embeddedJPEGpro​files.html (external link)
And see my comment to MSIGuy, below.

The instructions given do not seem to work on my iPhone or my Packard Bell Pentium II desktop. I will check tomorrow at work. I am to be thanking you for advice.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MSIGuy
Senior Member
Avatar
369 posts
Joined Mar 2008
     
Feb 22, 2011 22:36 |  #30

PhotosGuy wrote in post #11895827 (external link)
See the WEB BROWSER link above. You don't have to "calibrate your browser". You need to use a browser that recognizes embedded ICC profiles.
Firefox is one of the good ones. Except for the IE9(beta), IE wasn't the last time I checked.

Is Netscape 9 any good? I've heard of the fireFox but I'm just so used to Netscape!


Some cameras, some lenses, plenty of gaffer's tape and beer.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

10,734 views & 0 likes for this thread, 25 members have posted to it.
More trucks in the dark.
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Transportation 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2804 guests, 163 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.