jigelow wrote in post #11892378
Hello. I am new here and find this very interesting. I see you suggest calibrating my browser.
Is it a special version of Internet Explorer? I cannot find how to change browser calibration. Should I use a different browser? Netscape?
I posted a link, but maybe this will make more sense to you: WEB BROWSER COLOR MANAGEMENT TUTORIAL
http://www.gballard.net …embeddedJPEGprofiles.html
And see my comment to MSIGuy, below.
Cesium wrote in post #11892429
What? There is a technique for underexposing?
Here's just one example:
http://www.wonderhowto.com …o-night-photoshop-214630/
Like color balance, the "correct" exposure may not be the "right" exposure for a particular image. But like anything else, whatever you do, someone will love it, someone will hate it, & the vast majority will just yawn & go on to something else.
NicholasP wrote in post #11892479
Pretty outrageous to recommend "browser calibration."
You think that all 250,000+ members here are already aware of it?
lblaod wrote in post #11892533
Great shots, although they are blurry. I agree with robertwsimpson about the angle to your subject. Perhaps try "moving your feet" to get another perspective
Reread the first post. The majority of the subject in the shots is supposed to be blurred. I've included other shots that didn't work out very well for me, but might work out for someone else. For instance, you liked some of them, but they're still not what I'd like to get. So I'll keep at it.
MSIGuy wrote in post #11894841
I'm pretty sure there's an extension in Chrome for that.
I'm still trying to find one to calibrate my browser... All the photos in this thread look underexposed to me, stupid Firefox, I'm going to go try IE.
A dark image isn't necessarily underexposed. Maybe it was done for a purpose?
See the WEB BROWSER link above. You don't have to "calibrate your browser". You need to use a browser that recognizes embedded ICC profiles.
Firefox is one of the good ones. Except for the IE9(beta), IE wasn't the last time I checked.
davie rogue wrote in post #11895342
Wow, lots of wildly varying camera settings, with very little shot success and nothing really interesting compositionally.
Yup, light levels were changing. And I'd rather shoot something difficult like this than something easy.
Seems like the content in this thread might be better suited to a C+C / advice thread, but instead the original poster is just argumentative and rebutting any pointers. Not a very good attitude to have
Did I ask for C&C?
I posted the purpose of taking the shots, "the idea is to get the front sharp & the rest with some motion blur." This thread is just another 'step on the road' to getting them.