sorry not all of us desire to stop down in order to get everything in focus. just saying.
Didn't say you did.
macroshooter1970 Cream of the Crop 7,494 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jan 2007 Location: Arizona More info | Feb 03, 2011 21:18 | #16 canonnoob wrote in post #11772938 sorry not all of us desire to stop down in order to get everything in focus. just saying. Didn't say you did.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Keep the 300. As you already know, it is a wonderful and versatile lens. Keep your eyes open for trade in deals on the Canon EF 400mm f/2.8 L IS USM Lens when the pros trade for the Canon EF 400mm f/2.8 L IS II USM Lens. www.zivnuska.zenfolio.com/blog
LOG IN TO REPLY |
canonnoob THREAD STARTER Cream of the Crop 8,487 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2008 Location: Atlanta, GA More info | Feb 04, 2011 06:27 | #18 Thanks Phil, I think that is confirming my choice in waiting until the new ones come out and see how that affects the prices of the 400 IS. David W.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
liam5100 Senior Member 944 posts Joined Sep 2007 Location: Kansas More info | Feb 04, 2011 07:19 | #19 canonnoob wrote in post #11772844 Heres where I stand: the 300 can sell anywhere from 3600-3900. I can easily pick up a used 400 2.8 II for less and have cash left over. I can sell the 300 and put about an extra 2k into a 400 IS. or I can swing the money for the 400 mk II and keep the 300. Dave.. I can count the times on one hand I pulled the 300 out last year. Bill -
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dolina Cream of the Crop More info | Feb 04, 2011 07:28 | #20 patrickf117 wrote in post #11772831 get the 800 and be done with it. Too long unless you want to shoot body parts only and too slow unless you strobe the player. Visit my Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
canonnoob THREAD STARTER Cream of the Crop 8,487 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2008 Location: Atlanta, GA More info | Feb 04, 2011 08:11 | #21 liam5100 wrote in post #11774837 Dave.. I can count the times on one hand I pulled the 300 out last year. Bill, you also shoot much less high school stuff than I do though. Correct? I mean, the high school market is where I make my living. lol David W.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sledhed Goldmember 2,510 posts Likes: 3 Joined Jun 2005 Location: Crete, IL. More info | Feb 04, 2011 10:35 | #22 liam5100 wrote in post #11774837 Dave.. I can count the times on one hand I pulled the 300 out last year. Same here, once I got the 400 the 300 never got used anymore so it was sold. There have been a few times I wish I still had it but for the most part no regrets about selling it. Chris
LOG IN TO REPLY |
canonnoob THREAD STARTER Cream of the Crop 8,487 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2008 Location: Atlanta, GA More info | Feb 04, 2011 10:42 | #23 Sledhed wrote in post #11775884 Same here, once I got the 400 the 300 never got used anymore so it was sold. There have been a few times I wish I still had it but for the most part no regrets about selling it. Also Dave I think the new 400 IS II will be so expensive it could possibly even help the value of my IS. No one will know until they are out and see what the market does. As Phil said the problem with the Series II is getting it worked on if needed, it could turn into an expensive door stop. That is true. I have heard good things about midstatecamera and such doing repairs, so that was not on my main list of worries. I would probably go with the IS assuming the prices dropped some. 7k is a bit much for me right now. David W.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Huskers69 Senior Member 699 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jan 2009 More info | Feb 04, 2011 10:53 | #24 Dave, I am glad you posted this thread, as I am also trying to decide between a 300 and 400, not the II versions, but the IS models. How long do you think Canon will continue to service the lenses once the II's are out?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
canonnoob THREAD STARTER Cream of the Crop 8,487 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2008 Location: Atlanta, GA More info | Feb 04, 2011 10:54 | #25 ha. dont ask me... i dont know what the normal cycle is for discontinued lenses. David W.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dmwierz Goldmember 2,376 posts Likes: 2 Joined May 2005 Location: Chicago Area, IL More info | Feb 04, 2011 11:06 | #26 I have an EF 400 f/2.8L IS and am borrowing an EF 300 f/2.8L IS for basketball season...I'll tell you what: I used the 300 for a few games, and the IQ was a level below the 400, despite being better for framing than the 400 (the 400 on a 1.3X body is pretty tight for NBA and even NCAA sized players). So, I've gone back to using the 400 for shooting down-court action...I really WANTED the 300 to work since the field of view was more appropriate for hoops, but the decrease in IQ make it a non-starter for me. http://www.denniswierzbicki.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dolina Cream of the Crop More info | Feb 04, 2011 11:10 | #27 dmwierz wrote in post #11776099 I have an EF 400 f/2.8L IS and am borrowing an EF 300 f/2.8L IS for basketball season...I'll tell you what: I used the 300 for a few games, and the IQ was a level below the 400, despite being better for framing than the 400 (the 400 on a 1.3X body is pretty tight for NBA and even NCAA sized players). So, I've gone back to using the 400 for shooting down-court action...I really WANTED the 300 to work since the field of view was more appropriate for hoops, but the decrease in IQ make it a non-starter for me. When using the 300mm IS where do you position yourself for basketball? Near the rafters? Visit my Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dmwierz Goldmember 2,376 posts Likes: 2 Joined May 2005 Location: Chicago Area, IL More info | Feb 04, 2011 11:48 | #28 dolina wrote in post #11776119 When using the 300mm IS where do you position yourself for basketball? Near the rafters? Nope, just on the baseline. Below is an example of the field of view resulting from a 400 and a 300...the 300 is the wider shot (Noah and Howard). Both shot with a MkIIn (1.3X crop body). http://www.denniswierzbicki.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JohnPAtl Member 56 posts Joined Sep 2009 More info | Feb 04, 2011 13:48 | #29 Not sure if this is any help, Adorama has both lens listed not in stock but you can pre-order them 50D w/Grip, 18-135,70-200 f/2.8L, 50 /1.4, 85 /1.8 Speedlight 580EXII,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sch_photo Member 172 posts Joined Jul 2010 More info | Feb 04, 2011 13:59 | #30 Thank you.... someone in the same delema as me only reversed...I have a 400mm 2.8 actually a mk I and love it... I am dreading the $6k - $10k I am going to drop for new bodies... I actually thought about selling my 400 and getting a 300 and going to 2 7D bodies w/ grips... the problem is I have turned into a 1 series snob... is there a support group for this problem or an armored truck I can hi-jack? Equipment list: Canon 1Dx, Canon 1D mk III, 50D, 400mm 2.8L, 70-200mm 2.8L, 17-40 4.0L, 24-105 4.0L IS, Sigma 15mm 2.8 FE, (2) 580EX II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 1409 guests, 175 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||