Critique welcome.
Dylan_J Member 41 posts Joined Dec 2010 Location: Anglesey, North Wales, UK More info | Feb 04, 2011 09:59 | #1 Critique welcome. Canon 1000d
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dynamic03 Senior Member 341 posts Joined Jan 2010 More info | Feb 04, 2011 10:32 | #2 I like the feel of the photo but I think the composition could have been better, too many trees in the way. Canon 5D Mark II | 135mm L | 24-70mm L | 100mm f/2.8 macro | 50mm f/1.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 04, 2011 11:43 | #3 I couldnt get to a point where there was little trees and still get the little church in. Canon 1000d
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Scottdog129 Senior Member 637 posts Joined Sep 2009 Location: Reno, Nevada USA More info | Feb 04, 2011 14:53 | #4 Its a little busy for me. Scott Thompson - www.sthompsonphoto.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
pp2k Member 61 posts Joined Jan 2011 Location: East Anglia, England More info | Feb 04, 2011 16:22 | #5 I like it, the door being framed by the trees works.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
apor Junior Member 27 posts Joined Jan 2011 More info | Feb 04, 2011 17:31 | #6 my first post... T2i, EF-S 10-22, 17-40L, EF 50 1.4, EF 100mm 2.8 macro, EF 70-300L, [need to sell:EF-S 55-250, EF-S 15-85], 430ex II and some modifiers, 2x RF-602 system, tripod, some cables and things
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Spike44 Goldmember 2,155 posts Likes: 3 Joined Dec 2007 More info | Feb 04, 2011 20:19 | #7 Not too bad
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mikekelley "Meow! Bark! Honk! Hiss! Grrr! Tweet!" 7,317 posts Likes: 16 Joined Feb 2009 Location: Los Angeles, CA More info | Feb 04, 2011 20:49 | #8 I like the photo, the processing, and the trees. Los Angeles-Based Architectural, Interior, And Luxury Real Estate Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Joe.Recon Senior Member 674 posts Joined Jan 2011 Location: 45°25'26.8"N 75°41'56.5"W More info | Feb 05, 2011 05:28 | #9 dynamic03 wrote in post #11775860 I like the feel of the photo but I think the composition could have been better, too many trees in the way. Agreed but I love the post processing, good job Canon 5D MkIII powered through the following Canon lenses: 16-35 f2.8 L MkII, 24-70 f2.8 L MkII, 70-200 f2.8 L MkII, 17mm TS-E f4 L, 24mm TS-E f2.8 L MkII and 85mm f1.2 L MkII.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
skygod44 "in stockings and suspenders" 6,454 posts Gallery: 2 photos Likes: 110 Joined Nov 2008 Location: Southern Kyushu, Japan. Which means nowhere near Tokyo! More info | Like it! "Whatever you do, enjoy yourself...otherwise, what's the point."
LOG IN TO REPLY |
argyle Cream of the Crop 8,187 posts Likes: 24 Joined Apr 2007 Location: DFW, Texas More info | I don't know. If this was run through the HDR process, you've still got some blown highlights as well as some blocked shadows throughout the image...needs a bit of re-work (unless this is the look that you're after). It may even benefit from a B/W conversion, considering the subject matter. "Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son". - Dean Wormer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PictureNorthCarolina Gaaaaa! DOH!! Oops! 9,318 posts Likes: 248 Joined Apr 2006 Location: North Carolina More info | Feb 05, 2011 07:54 | #12 I think it's a good start. Looks like after tonemapping you applied a bleach effect? Or at least it appears so. Not sure I like that. Website
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 05, 2011 14:11 | #13 Thanks everyone for the comments, Canon 1000d
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mikekelley "Meow! Bark! Honk! Hiss! Grrr! Tweet!" 7,317 posts Likes: 16 Joined Feb 2009 Location: Los Angeles, CA More info | Feb 05, 2011 18:28 | #14 NO!!! Los Angeles-Based Architectural, Interior, And Luxury Real Estate Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cyclekraft Junior Member 20 posts Joined Feb 2011 Location: Fort Collins More info | Feb 09, 2011 10:25 | #15 I agree with the above statement...the trees make the shot. However, the processing of this image was overdone IMO. My eyes bounce around the image not focusing on one particular area. Perhaps a different perspective, different lighting (time of day) or less tone mapping would help make the image pop. It appears under-saturated and over contrasted for my liking. If only the sky in the background was consumed with something. Otherwise I like the photo overall. Nice work!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is AlainPre 1580 guests, 153 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||