Engagement: John and Kim

I shot this awesome couple in Late January. I really enjoyed my time with them and the way the snow came down the day before, really made this shoot work well. Comments always helpful.

1.

HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png' | Redirected to error image by ZENFOLIO PROTECTED

HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png' | Redirected to error image by ZENFOLIO PROTECTED

HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png' | Redirected to error image by ZENFOLIO PROTECTED

HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png' | Redirected to error image by ZENFOLIO PROTECTED

I like these; they're all pretty nice.

Great set. They look like they're having a blast! I really like the comps in 3-4 and 6-7.

Thanks all. I appreciate the comments.

Nice set, cool idea with the heart on the snow in #3 but isn't the watermark ruining it a bit? that's why it's hard to see it =/

Tony TPN wrote in post #11776333
Nice set, cool idea with the heart on the snow in #3 but isn't the watermark ruining it a bit? that's why it's hard to see it =/

Nope. The watermark doesn't ruin the photos. Its just a price to protect the photos.

what lens you use for #8?

Lil Freek wrote in post #11777512
what lens you use for #8?

70-200 2.8 IS mk II

Holy soccer watermark!

Aside from the watermark, the shots are nice. #4 is a lot of fun.

Very cute! I bet they loved them! you captured their personalities really well!

canonnoob wrote in post #11776353
Nope. The watermark doesn't ruin the photos. Its just a price to protect the photos.

Umm, it does #2. She has a soccer ball/camera for a face, just move it down a bit or knock the opacity way down.

Besides that its not too bad, nice job

Hotsauce wrote in post #11779918
Umm, it does #2. She has a soccer ball/camera for a face, just move it down a bit or knock the opacity way down.

Besides that its not too bad, nice job

haha. agreed, but great set bud.

all around nice work, last one rocks!

Lovely, love #5

canonnoob wrote in post #11776353
Nope. The watermark doesn't ruin the photos. Its just a price to protect the photos.

Yeah, we are going to have to disagree here.

helloagain36 wrote in post #11777617
Holy soccer watermark!

Aside from the watermark, the shots are nice. #4 is a lot of fun.

With the watermark, I understand branding but it seems odd to me to have engagement photos with sports photography plastered all over it.

Hotsauce wrote in post #11779918
Umm, it does #2. She has a soccer ball/camera for a face, just move it down a bit or knock the opacity way down.

Besides that its not too bad, nice job

#2 and 3 are really hurt IMO.

I think you have some good photos here, but obviously the watermark left an impression with.