Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 04 Feb 2011 (Friday) 10:04
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Engagement: John and Kim

 
canonnoob
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,487 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Atlanta, GA
     
Feb 04, 2011 10:04 |  #1

I shot this awesome couple in Late January. I really enjoyed my time with them and the way the snow came down the day before, really made this shoot work well. Comments always helpful.

1.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


2.
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


3. (Good Idea, Poor Execution).
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


4.
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png' | Redirected to error image by ZENFOLIO PROTECTED


5.
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png' | Redirected to error image by ZENFOLIO PROTECTED


6.
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


7.
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png' | Redirected to error image by ZENFOLIO PROTECTED


8.
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png' | Redirected to error image by ZENFOLIO PROTECTED

David W.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
glasshouse
Member
93 posts
Joined Jan 2011
     
Feb 04, 2011 10:28 |  #2
bannedPermanent ban

I like these; they're all pretty nice.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lindsaytblum
Goldmember
Avatar
2,540 posts
Joined May 2008
Location: Chesterfield, MO
     
Feb 04, 2011 11:46 |  #3

Great set. They look like they're having a blast! I really like the comps in 3-4 and 6-7.


Canon 7D | 24-70mm f/2.8L II, 135mm f/2.0L, 100mm f/2.8L IS USM, 85mm f/1.8
Portfolio (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
canonnoob
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,487 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Atlanta, GA
     
Feb 04, 2011 11:49 |  #4

Thanks all. I appreciate the comments.


David W.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tony ­ TPN
Senior Member
Avatar
268 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Nov 2010
Location: Montreal(Qc)
     
Feb 04, 2011 11:52 |  #5

Nice set, cool idea with the heart on the snow in #3 but isn't the watermark ruining it a bit? that's why it's hard to see it =/


They say milk gives you strength...drink 3 glasses and try to move a wall...You Can't...But take 3 shots of vodka...And the wall moves on its own =D
Blog (external link)
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
canonnoob
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,487 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Atlanta, GA
     
Feb 04, 2011 11:55 |  #6

Tony TPN wrote in post #11776333 (external link)
Nice set, cool idea with the heart on the snow in #3 but isn't the watermark ruining it a bit? that's why it's hard to see it =/

Nope. The watermark doesn't ruin the photos. Its just a price to protect the photos.


David W.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lil ­ Freek
Member
Avatar
145 posts
Joined Mar 2010
     
Feb 04, 2011 15:10 |  #7

what lens you use for #8?


Gripped Canon T2i
18-55mm | 55-250mm | 50mm f/1.8 | 24-105L | Sig 10-20 f/4-5.6 | YN468 | 2x YN560

unlikelytarget.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
canonnoob
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,487 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Atlanta, GA
     
Feb 04, 2011 15:11 |  #8

Lil Freek wrote in post #11777512 (external link)
what lens you use for #8?

70-200 2.8 IS mk II


David W.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
helloagain36
Goldmember
Avatar
1,494 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Owls Head, Maine
     
Feb 04, 2011 15:26 as a reply to  @ canonnoob's post |  #9

Holy soccer watermark!

Aside from the watermark, the shots are nice. #4 is a lot of fun.


_______________
Pennsylvania Wedding Photographer
Facebook (external link) | Twitter (external link) | Gear
www.siousca.com (external link)
-Dave

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Joelene
Senior Member
930 posts
Joined Jun 2009
     
Feb 04, 2011 15:59 |  #10

Very cute! I bet they loved them! you captured their personalities really well!


www.joelenemillsphotog​raphy.ca (external link)
This is a beautiful shot ..bw!
Miniflash

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hotsauce
Member
Avatar
151 posts
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Ottawa, On, Canada
     
Feb 04, 2011 22:20 |  #11

canonnoob wrote in post #11776353 (external link)
Nope. The watermark doesn't ruin the photos. Its just a price to protect the photos.

Umm, it does #2. She has a soccer ball/camera for a face, just move it down a bit or knock the opacity way down.

Besides that its not too bad, nice job :)


Dave
Flickr (external link)
Blog (external link)
MM (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jerk.photo
Senior Member
448 posts
Joined Jan 2010
Location: I hail from the great state of O-H-I-O.
     
Feb 04, 2011 22:29 |  #12

Hotsauce wrote in post #11779918 (external link)
Umm, it does #2. She has a soccer ball/camera for a face, just move it down a bit or knock the opacity way down.

Besides that its not too bad, nice job :)

haha. agreed, but great set bud.


Gripped 5D Mark II l 100L l PCB b800 l Vagabond II l Lumopro LP160 x3 l

Broke and lovin' it...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rodddy
Senior Member
Avatar
428 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Waterford, Ontario, Canada
     
Feb 05, 2011 08:03 |  #13

all around nice work, last one rocks!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
woog17
Senior Member
710 posts
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Kent, United Kingdom.
     
Feb 05, 2011 08:04 |  #14

Lovely, love #5


Dan
danwoolgar.com (external link)
500px (external link)

equipment

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Red ­ Tie ­ Photography
Goldmember
Avatar
3,575 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2009
Location: San Diego
     
Feb 05, 2011 15:54 |  #15

canonnoob wrote in post #11776353 (external link)
Nope. The watermark doesn't ruin the photos. Its just a price to protect the photos.

Yeah, we are going to have to disagree here.

helloagain36 wrote in post #11777617 (external link)
Holy soccer watermark!

Aside from the watermark, the shots are nice. #4 is a lot of fun.

With the watermark, I understand branding but it seems odd to me to have engagement photos with sports photography plastered all over it.

Hotsauce wrote in post #11779918 (external link)
Umm, it does #2. She has a soccer ball/camera for a face, just move it down a bit or knock the opacity way down.

Besides that its not too bad, nice job :)

#2 and 3 are really hurt IMO.

I think you have some good photos here, but obviously the watermark left an impression with.


Bryan
Gear List (external link)
San Diego Wedding Photography - Red Tie Photography (external link)
Red Tie Photography Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,458 views & 0 likes for this thread, 20 members have posted to it.
Engagement: John and Kim
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1409 guests, 175 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.