 | HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' |
DJ JonOne
by Dayne Mahadeo][www.daynemahadeo.com, on Flickr
ddaayynnee Senior Member 381 posts Joined Mar 2010 Location: new york, long island More info | Oct 29, 2011 14:06 | #7036 |
Oct 29, 2011 15:25 | #7037 peterbj7 wrote in post #13325083 In what way? The main differences I see are obviously the wider angle view with the same lens, and the higher resolution. Much cleaner file straight out of the camera. Less noise which means less work in post processing.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Hardcore Goldmember  2,668 posts Likes: 4 Joined Jul 2008 More info | Oct 29, 2011 15:38 | #7038 peterbj7 wrote in post #13325083 In what way? The main differences I see are obviously the wider angle view with the same lens, and the higher resolution. I'd say the main difference is the dof and subject isolation at the same aperture.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TheDevil Goldmember  1,023 posts Joined Oct 2010 Location: Tallinn, Estonia More info | Oct 29, 2011 17:51 | #7039 Kafn8td wrote in post #13325635 Much cleaner file straight out of the camera. Less noise which means less work in post processing. NR is one of the smallest parts(as far as time consumption goes anyway) of PP. A good photographer can take extraordinary photos anywhere, with any camera and any lens while a mediocre one will take mediocre ones everywhere, with every camera and every lens.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JimmyDude911 Senior Member  774 posts Likes: 4 Joined May 2011 Location: Texas More info | Oct 29, 2011 17:55 | #7040 The Devil wrote in post #13326152 NR is one of the smallest parts(as far as time consumption goes anyway) of PP. but a less noisy picture to begin with is better than an image with a bunch of NR, no? Canon EOS 5D Mark ii | Canon 50/1.4 |Rokinon 85/1.4 |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TheDevil Goldmember 1,023 posts Joined Oct 2010 Location: Tallinn, Estonia More info | Oct 29, 2011 18:15 | #7041 Indeed. However, NR itself doesn't take much work in PP, which was the original statement - how much work does it take exactly. The answer to which is almost none. A good photographer can take extraordinary photos anywhere, with any camera and any lens while a mediocre one will take mediocre ones everywhere, with every camera and every lens.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 29, 2011 18:22 | #7042  Day 104 of 365 by madyimages, on FlickrBen
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kf095 Out buying Wheaties  More info | Oct 29, 2011 18:29 | #7043 The Devil wrote in post #13326242 Indeed. However, NR itself doesn't take much work in PP, which was the original statement - how much work does it take exactly. The answer to which is almost none. But yes, it is undoubtedly better to have a cleaner file to begin with. NR eats IQ. M-E and ME blog
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TheDevil Goldmember 1,023 posts Joined Oct 2010 Location: Tallinn, Estonia More info | Oct 29, 2011 18:31 | #7044 kf095 wrote in post #13326287 NR eats IQ. Thank you, Captain Obvious. A good photographer can take extraordinary photos anywhere, with any camera and any lens while a mediocre one will take mediocre ones everywhere, with every camera and every lens.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JimmyDude911 Senior Member 774 posts Likes: 4 Joined May 2011 Location: Texas More info | Oct 29, 2011 18:34 | #7046 The Devil wrote in post #13326242 Indeed. However, NR itself doesn't take much work in PP, which was the original statement - how much work does it take exactly. The answer to which is almost none. But yes, it is undoubtedly better to have a cleaner file to begin with. totally agree with you on the work it takes (virtually none). the advantage i think i enjoy the most is the DOF Canon EOS 5D Mark ii | Canon 50/1.4 |Rokinon 85/1.4 |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kf095 Out buying Wheaties More info | Oct 29, 2011 19:08 | #7047 The Devil wrote in post #13326294 Thank you, Captain Obvious. My point was that NR doesn't really take much work. Nothing more, nothing less. Besides, the bit of detail you do lose with NR is insignificant, unless you either look at the files at 100% or print MASSIVE prints, and then look at 'em really close, possibly with a magnifying glass. Well, if you dare to call some names on me you better be the King of PP. M-E and ME blog
LOG IN TO REPLY |
icebat Goldmember  1,267 posts Likes: 3 Joined Nov 2009 Location: Lurking in the 5d thread. More info | Oct 29, 2011 19:14 | #7048 Here's one from the other day. I'm really happy with how this came out. Any c&c welcome.
Justin by Sean Farrell23, on FlickrFlickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JimmyDude911 Senior Member 774 posts Likes: 4 Joined May 2011 Location: Texas More info | Oct 29, 2011 20:11 | #7049 icebat wrote in post #13326382 Here's one from the other day. I'm really happy with how this came out. Any c&c welcome.
Justin by Sean Farrell23, on Flickrlooks good! maybe a little more contrast? Canon EOS 5D Mark ii | Canon 50/1.4 |Rokinon 85/1.4 |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mookalafalas Cream of the Crop  More info | Oct 29, 2011 20:20 | #7050 Icebat, that's awesome. One for the portfolio. Call me Al Gear Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2451 guests, 105 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
