Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 06 Feb 2011 (Sunday) 09:42
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

How's my photoshopping?

 
smackitsakic
Member
126 posts
Joined Mar 2010
     
Feb 06, 2011 09:42 |  #1

Took some time this weekend to play around with Photoshop. I'm still fairly new to this technology, but wanted to give it a go with some older photographs that are in my archives.

Too much photoshopping in some? Not enough in others? My priority for the majority of these was some adjustments to colouring and some selective sharpening.


1

IMAGE: http://i1005.photobucket.com/albums/af173/smackitsakic/a.jpg

2

IMAGE: http://i1005.photobucket.com/albums/af173/smackitsakic/b.jpg

3

IMAGE: http://i1005.photobucket.com/albums/af173/smackitsakic/d.jpg

4

IMAGE: http://i1005.photobucket.com/albums/af173/smackitsakic/c.jpg



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ben ­ Daniels
Senior Member
Avatar
950 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: East Preston, West Sussex ,England
     
Feb 06, 2011 09:46 |  #2

Too much colour on all for me.
# 3 could look good in B&W



5DMK2 w/Grip: 40D w/Grip: Canon D60: 100mm F2.8 Macro USM : EF17-35mm F2.8
L : EF70-200mm f4L IS : Canon 1.4x Converter II : BG-E2 grip :TC420EX : Tamrac Ex5 bag :Manfrotto 055XPROB:Lee Filter System

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
YankeeMom
Goldmember
Avatar
3,120 posts
Gallery: 312 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 470
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Wisconsin
     
Feb 06, 2011 09:51 |  #3

I agree -- too much saturation and over-sharpened. :(


Kristin
Mom to 11 ~ Still sane and rocking my Canon 5DMkII.
Calibrated with Spyder 4
Website (external link)
| Blog (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Facebook (external link) | 500px (external link) | Pinterest (external link) | Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bohdank
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
14,060 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Montreal, Canada
     
Feb 06, 2011 10:03 |  #4

#1 is OOF, Also too much contrast and the exposure could be dropped down a touch.

The last.... has a bluish color cast although the grass looks good.

The rest is more a matter of taste although the car is a bit too much. If you could lower the saturation in the wheel/tire that would help, imo.


Bohdan - I may be, and probably am, completely wrong.
Gear List

Montreal Concert, Event and Portrait Photographer (external link)
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rimmer
Goldmember
Avatar
1,416 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Nov 2010
     
Feb 06, 2011 11:12 |  #5

Just a quick observation regarding #1: In the original the histogram is nicely distributed; in the edited version there are big spikes on the left and right so that the highlights are blown and the shadows are blocked. My personal approach would have been to knock the highlights down just a tiny bit and darken the mid-tones a little, and leave the blacks pretty much alone.


Ace Rimmer -- "What a guy!"
"Smoke me a kipper, I'll be back for breakfast." ;)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
smackitsakic
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
126 posts
Joined Mar 2010
     
Feb 06, 2011 13:38 |  #6

Thanks for the comments all.

Rimmer - I didn't pay much attention to the histogram, which is my fault. I assume that the spikes are from the conversion of the tree to black and white, though I could be wrong in that? I'd offer that the face in the photoshopped version is a little bit blown out and should have been brought down.

Bohdank - Not sure if image #1 is OOF? It doesn't really look like it to me, but clarify if you have a moment please so that I can improve next time around:)

I'd also agree that the colours are a little bit overdone and a little bit over-saturated. It was hard not to get trigger happy on some of the adjustments just to see their effect, but then again I shoudl have known better than to post over-postprocessed images into a critquing area! My bad. Which photos do you specifically think are over-sharpened? Maybe I was too excited to explore the unsharp-mask feature.

Thanks for the comments all - would to hear further explanations and suggested improvements. I'll hopefully look at these in another year and think, wow, those photoshop adjustments are nowhere near what I would be able to do with them now.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rimmer
Goldmember
Avatar
1,416 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Nov 2010
     
Feb 06, 2011 14:30 |  #7

OK, my total lack of awareness on the B&W conversion -- I just assumed that you had pushed the contrast way too hard! Sorry that I didn't pick up on it. :oops:

I know what you mean about maybe going too far with adjustments sometime. I sure can identify with that. I still find it useful to either shoot RAW + JPG or use DPP to produce a JPG from the RAW without any adjustment, and then make occasional comparisons as I work. That has saved me quite a few times when I had "run off the rails" with my editing but failed to recognize it until I went back and compared with "what the camera saw." :D


Ace Rimmer -- "What a guy!"
"Smoke me a kipper, I'll be back for breakfast." ;)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,458 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
How's my photoshopping?
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2659 guests, 154 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.