Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 06 Feb 2011 (Sunday) 15:25
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Help with 7D and exposure, getting frustrated with this camera

 
Nascar ­ Nut
Senior Member
503 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 72
Joined Feb 2004
     
Feb 06, 2011 15:25 |  #1

I have up graded from a 40D to the 7D and I am very frustrated with this camera. I use a 100-400L lens. I had a ton more keepers with my 40D then this one. I think a lot of my problem is proper exposure. This camera rarely get the exposure right on its own unlike my 40D. I am sure this is user error on my part as this camera has a larger learning curve then the 40D. I shoot mostly wildlife and it is on the move and rarely setting still to even try to set the exposure. I shoot in AV mode and evaluating metering. I usually use single point focus and expanded. My birds in flight seem to never turn out. The exposure and the focus seem to be off when the subject is not well lit. I went down to the river yesterday and there were some eagles around and waterfowl and almost all my shots were bad. Now I did take some nice photos of a flock of swans but the darker eagles and a mallard that came flying in all turned out bad. Is it just that I need very good lighting for this lens? I even took some shots of a pair of eagles setting in a tree and they were out of focus and under exposed a little. It just seems I can't even get good basic shots from this camera.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sorarse
Goldmember
Avatar
2,193 posts
Likes: 25
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Kent, UK
     
Feb 06, 2011 15:56 |  #2

I can't advise you specifically as I don't own this camera, but I have a few suggestions. It seems that what you are trying to photograph could be tricky even for someone who knows their camera inside out. I'd suggest perhaps going back to photographing easier subjects, ones that aren't moving so quickly or are not so challenging, and use that time as a process to get to know your camera better. As you become more confident and successful with easier subjects, slowly move up to the types of subjects you are currently having problems with.

As you acknowledge, your current problems appear to be down to user error, as we all know that the 7D is capable of taking stunning images.


At the beginning of time there was absolutely nothing. And then it exploded! Terry Pratchett

http://www.scarecrowim​ages.com (external link)
Canon PowerShot G2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KaiserSose
Member
123 posts
Joined Jan 2011
     
Feb 06, 2011 15:57 |  #3
bannedPermanent ban

I'm not sure I consider a "dark bird in flight" a "basic shot". I've never been able to get good shots of birds in flight in Av with either my (first) Xt or my 40/30D So I always use manual




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
silver912
Hatchling
3 posts
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Texas
     
Feb 06, 2011 16:58 |  #4

I have both the 7d and 100-400L which is great for wildlife. I always use TV mode (shutter priority) on moving sujects. I set my shutter speed at 2500 minmun and ISO 1250 or up. Noise, yes but I use a program to clean that up. The position of the sun will determine if the underside of a bird is to dark. Best to try to position yourself where you can take advantage of the light to highlight the greastest part of the bird. Sometomes I'll take 200 or more shots and just keep a small number, but that is wildlife photography. Go to my website www.longhornphotograph​y.net (external link) and look at the Eagle album and you will see the lighting is very hard to get correct on every shot




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pbelarge
Goldmember
Avatar
2,837 posts
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Westchester County, NY
     
Feb 06, 2011 17:25 |  #5

silver912 wrote in post #11789988 (external link)
I have both the 7d and 100-400L which is great for wildlife. I always use TV mode (shutter priority) on moving sujects. I set my shutter speed at 2500 minmun and ISO 1250 or up. Noise, yes but I use a program to clean that up. The position of the sun will determine if the underside of a bird is to dark. Best to try to position yourself where you can take advantage of the light to highlight the greastest part of the bird. Sometomes I'll take 200 or more shots and just keep a small number, but that is wildlife photography. Go to my website www.longhornphotograph​y.net (external link) and look at the Eagle album and you will see the lighting is very hard to get correct on every shot

This is good advice.

My 2 cents - be patient, once you learn the camera, you will be very glad you made the change, especially with the type of photography you are pursuing.
Good luck, and when you have improved some please post us you awesome images.


just a few of my thoughts...
Pierre

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Miki ­ G
Goldmember
1,179 posts
Likes: 401
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Ireland
     
Feb 06, 2011 17:35 |  #6

Your choice of metering may be the problem. A dark bird flying against a bright sky or background will underexpose the bird if your meter is working properly. Likewise, a white bird against a dark background will cause the bird to be overexposed. Evaluative metering will expose for an average exposure for the given scene. If there is too much bright or dark areas in the shot, this will affect the metering.If you could post a few sample shots, it would be easier to evaluate where the problem lays.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosGuy
Cream of the Crop, R.I.P.
Avatar
75,941 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 2611
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Middle of Michigan
     
Feb 07, 2011 10:07 |  #7

KaiserSose wrote in post #11789555 (external link)
I'm not sure I consider a "dark bird in flight" a "basic shot". I've never been able to get good shots of birds in flight in Av with either my (first) Xt or my 40/30D So I always use manual

That's my solution too. Need an exposure crutch?

Why?
Post #47


FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1600 pixels on any side.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
stsva
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,363 posts
Gallery: 45 photos
Likes: 286
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Northern Virginia
     
Feb 07, 2011 15:05 |  #8

When it comes to exposure, if there's a lot of dynamic range in the scene (for example, dark bird, bright sky), then you have three basic choices:
1) Try for an "average" exposure, which may make the bird too dark but also might work OK;
2) Expose for the bird, which may make the sky too bright (white sky syndrome); or,
3) Expose for the sky, which may make the bird too dark.

Only with #2 will you guarantee a good exposure for your subject, the bird. It all depends on what's really important to you in the shot you're trying to get.


Some Canon stuff and a little bit of Yongnuo.
Member of the GIYF
Club and
HAMSTTR
٩ Breeders Club https://photography-on-the.net …=744235&highlig​ht=hamsttr Join today!
Image Editing OK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,463 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4552
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Feb 07, 2011 15:10 |  #9

The replies so far seem to be missing the point of the OP's lament, "I had a ton more keepers with my 40D then this one. I think a lot of my problem is proper exposure. This camera rarely get the exposure right on its own unlike my 40D. I am sure this is user error on my part as this camera has a larger learning curve then the 40D."

Just what is different about a 7D which makes it behave any differently than a 40D ?!?!?!


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
[Hyuni]
Goldmember
Avatar
1,186 posts
Likes: 15
Joined Dec 2008
Location: CHiCAGO
     
Feb 07, 2011 15:15 |  #10

^
in terms of how the camera calculates exposure in AV mode, there should be nothing.

I have a feeling that the OP had auto ISO on in his 40D and doesn't on his 7D, which results in him getting blurry shots due to a slower shutter speed.


6D Rokinon 14 f/2.8 l EF 35 ƒ1.4L l EF 135 ƒ2.0L l EF 70-200 ƒ2.8L IS II l YN460 l 580EX II l Flick'd (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nascar ­ Nut
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
503 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 72
Joined Feb 2004
     
Feb 07, 2011 18:17 |  #11

Ok, I am posting a few samples here. I understand about the sky and a dark bird and vise versa. Should I be using spot metering for that? I have never set either camera to auto ISO. I try to keep my shutter speed up to at least 400 but the shot changes a lot when my subject moves. So that is not always possible. Anyway, here is four shots. I did nothing to these photos except to crop and convert them to jpg. Shots like these seemed to be much better with my 40D.

IMAGE: http://the-outdoorsman.net/temp/IMG_2900020711.jpg

I got three shots of this mallard before he flew and none turned out. I had filtered sunlight on him.
IMAGE: http://the-outdoorsman.net/temp/IMG_2915020711.jpg

These eagles were a ways away, so this shot is cropped a lot so I wouldn't expect it to be perfect. I took six shots at these and this was the best one.
IMAGE: http://the-outdoorsman.net/temp/IMG_2924020711.jpg


Now I was more happy with the swans. They are a little over exposed but more then fixable.

IMAGE: http://the-outdoorsman.net/temp/IMG_2961020611.jpg



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,463 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4552
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Feb 07, 2011 19:04 |  #12

Your first shot EXIF shows 1/3200 f/6.3 with ISO 400. One can tell that the metering was biased to expose the sky. Ordinarily ISO 400 should expose a subject in sunlight at 1/400 f/16...so your 1/3200 f/6.3 is about a comparable exposure! But your subject is not lit by the sun, it seems to be in shade ...maybe from a passing cloud (there are no visible shadows) where proper exposure is +1EV or even +2EV from the Sunny 16 rule of thumb.

Your third shot EXIF shows 1/640 f/11 with ISO 200. According to Sunny 16, that would be 1/200 f/16. Again, your subject is not in sunlight, there is no visible shadow. The subjects again seem to be in shade....maybe from a passing cloud.

I would not blame the camera, I would put the camera in Manual mode, meter an 18% gray card held at the same angle to the sun and in similar light as your subject would be, and fix that setting on the camera and shoot.

A meter tries to make whatever it is reading to be captured as 18% gray...that is a fundamental understanding that every photographer needs to repeat 1000 times!

Here is an 18% gray card which is not illuminated by the sun (yet there is definitely sunlight visible on the tree in the background)...

IMAGE: http://i69.photobucket.com/albums/i63/wiltonw/Spotoncard.jpg

And here is the same 18% gray card as metered with Evaluative mode...the metering tries to factor in the brightness of the adjacent zones even while it is biasing the metering to the fozusing zone (which is on the 18% gray card)
IMAGE: http://i69.photobucket.com/albums/i63/wiltonw/Evalcard.jpg

You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
number ­ six
fully entitled to be jealous
Avatar
8,964 posts
Likes: 109
Joined May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
     
Feb 08, 2011 14:23 |  #13

Nascar Nut wrote in post #11797357 (external link)
Now I was more happy with the swans. They are a little over exposed but more then fixable.

If the swans look overexposed to you, I'd suggest you adjust the brightness/contrast of your monitor. They look just right to me on my calibrated monitor.

Running the eyedropper over the birds I found no part of them with a red, green or blue value higher than 244. Pure white is 255,255,255.

Here's a brightness/contrast calibration chart. You should be able to see all 26 bars:


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


"Be seeing you."
50D - 17-55 f/2.8 IS - 18-55 IS - 28-105 II USM - 60 f/2.8 macro - 70-200 f/4 L - Sigma flash

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jase1125
Goldmember
Avatar
3,027 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 82
Joined May 2010
Location: Lewisville, TX (DFW)
     
Feb 08, 2011 14:50 |  #14

[Hyuni wrote:
='[Hyuni];11796121']^
in terms of how the camera calculates exposure in AV mode, there should be nothing.

I have a feeling that the OP had auto ISO on in his 40D and doesn't on his 7D, which results in him getting blurry shots due to a slower shutter speed.

Actually there is a difference between the two cameras. The 7D now uses a 63 zone system that takes color into account where the 40D does not when set to evaluative metering.

Here is what I suggest for exposure. Go out and set your aperture or shutter speed to your desired value. On a clear sky, meter with no exposure compensation. Now dial in more exposure until you barely blow the sky shooting the same area of sky. Look at how much EC you have to dial in to blow it. Now when shooting birds in the sky, you know exactly how much EC to dial in before you lose the sky. Do that and you will keep a little color in the sky and expose the bird better while minimizing noise in dark colored birds. For the record, with my 7d, i can dial in 2 2/3 stops EC before I blow the sky. I typically limit myself to 2 1/3 though.

Hope that helps.


Jason

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Snydremark
my very own Lightrules moment
20,051 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Likes: 5573
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Issaquah, WA USA
     
Feb 08, 2011 14:51 |  #15

Spot metering would certain help where the bird is against a bright/washed out sky. Also, with the 7D especially (I came from the 40D/100-400 setup myself), you really need to keep the shutter above 1/640; the sharpness dropoff from shake, for me anyway, is frequently huge even at 1/400-1/500.

Also, you don't necessarily need great light, but you do need to make sure you aren't underexposing your shots at all. If it gets really overcast, I'll generally adjust my settings, manually or via EC, so that I'm shooting at between +2/3 and +1 2/3 just to make sure. Don't be afraid to shoot higher ISOs, either. 800-1600 can be perfectly usable with this camera, where I saw problems that I couldn't correct for on the 40D in that range.

Make sure your AF settings are squared away and if you're trying to shoot BIF, adjust your AI Server tracking down a notch or two to give you some wiggle room for reacquiring your subject when you stray off of it while panning.

Don't jack your aperture down so low, either. F/11 is pretty harsh with the ole "pump"...I shoot between 5.6 and 8 and even then, MOSTLY at 5.6. Give the distances you are from most birds, that still gives plenty of DoF for most shots.

When shooting things that are likely to move, or are moving, etc, I would strongly recommend Tv instead of Av. Your primary concern at that point ought to be keeping your shutter speeds up, and even f/5.6 should give you a reasonable DoF on them should the camera need to open it up to get those shutter speeds.

This weekend was hell for lighting, but still got some decent shots:

IMAGE: http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5220/5427597326_1a7fedd922.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/snydremark/5427​597326/  (external link)
Bald Eagle-1734 (external link) by Guideon72 (external link), on Flickr

IMAGE: http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5096/5426992225_144bb24cf7.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/snydremark/5426​992225/  (external link)
EIF-1690 (external link) by Guideon72 (external link), on Flickr

IMAGE: http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5139/5426992169_68237880ff.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/snydremark/5426​992169/  (external link)
Black Turnstone-1654 (external link) by Guideon72 (external link), on Flickr

Visit any of those and do Actions, View Exif Info and you can see what sort of settings I was using with the 7D/100-400 combo. Your swan shot came out really quite nice there!

There's a LOT of learning to do coming from the 40D to the 7D, but once you really start to get it down it's really a great camera.

- Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife (external link) (R5, RF 800 f/11, Canon 16-35 F/4 MkII, Canon 24-105L f/4 IS, Canon 70-200L f/2.8 IS MkII, Canon 100-400L f/4.5-5.6 IS I/II)
"The easiest way to improve your photos is to adjust the loose nut between the shutter release and the ground."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,903 views & 0 likes for this thread, 16 members have posted to it.
Help with 7D and exposure, getting frustrated with this camera
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1039 guests, 107 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.