dlleno Senior Member 265 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2007 More info | Feb 06, 2011 23:51 | #16 mesodan wrote in post #11791882  Going to be pricey I'm guessing, $4-5k+??? $6-7K easy, is my guess. but imagine the flexibility -- no need to reach into your bag for the 1.4x nice going Canon thats very clever 5D mark iii, EF-24-105mm f/4, EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS II USM, Speedlite 580 EX II plus 3x Yongnuo 568EX, photoflex 60" white umbrella, Westcott Apollo Orb with grid
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sam6644 Senior Member 691 posts Likes: 3 Joined Jan 2010 Location: Cincinnati, Ohio More info | Feb 06, 2011 23:52 | #17 I'm pretty excited about this, but I know it's going to be crazy expensive, so I'm a little bummed out too. my site (very outdated at this point)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
shoturtle Goldmember  1,187 posts Joined Oct 2010 Location: NYC/Frankfurt A.M. More info | Feb 06, 2011 23:52 | #18 I expect a 5k price at least. Traveling is my passion, so I am a major Frequent Flyer.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
oooo!! Canon EOS-1D Mark II N | Sony Alpha NEX-6 | Canon EOS 5D | Canon EOS 6D | Canon EOS 6D Mark II | EF 70-200mm 1:2.8 L USM | EF 24-70mm 1:2.8 L USM | EF 17-40mm 1:4 L USM | EF 50mm 1:1.8 STM | EF 40mm 1:2.8 STM | EF 35mm 1:2 IS USM | EF 24-105mm 1:4 L IS USM | 580EX II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
themadman Cream of the Crop  18,871 posts Likes: 14 Joined Nov 2009 Location: Northern California More info | Feb 06, 2011 23:54 | #20 shoturtle wrote in post #11791884 I not sure, but that would be a major jump in price form the ef 100-400, even the ef 70-200 2.8L only went form 1700 to 2500. Nikon has a 200-400 f4 VR lens that is a little under $7000. Canon's 70-200 f2.8 IS MKII exceeded's Nikon's 70-200 f3.8 VR II (although it is better). I suspect this will be similar in price if not a little more expensive to the Nikon. Will | WilliamLiuPhotography.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
liupublic Goldmember 1,114 posts Likes: 2 Joined Mar 2009 Location: Tempe AZ More info | Step=1: Win the powerball Still learning
LOG IN TO REPLY |
krb Cream of the Crop  8,818 posts Likes: 8 Joined Jun 2008 Location: Where southern efficiency and northern charm come together More info | Feb 06, 2011 23:54 | #22 shoturtle wrote in post #11791884 I not sure, but that would be a major jump in price form the ef 100-400, even the ef 70-200 2.8L only went form 1700 to 2500. This is not a replacement for the 100-400. -- Ken
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Staszek Goldmember  3,606 posts Likes: 4 Joined Mar 2010 Location: San Jose, CA More info | This is awesome. I've been wondering why Canon wasn't producing such a lens. There are a good number of professional sports photographers who love the Nikon 200-400 for day time and early evening games. SOSKIphoto
LOG IN TO REPLY |
themadman Cream of the Crop 18,871 posts Likes: 14 Joined Nov 2009 Location: Northern California More info | Feb 06, 2011 23:55 | #24 Nikon's http://www.bhphotovideo.com …IKKOR_200_400mm_f_4G.html Will | WilliamLiuPhotography.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
vegasboy Goldmember  2,366 posts Likes: 47 Joined Sep 2005 Location: Los Angeles, CA More info | Jesus... SO much money. -Alex
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dlleno Senior Member 265 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2007 More info | thats the only sad part -- its going to be so expensive... 5D mark iii, EF-24-105mm f/4, EF 70-200 f/2.8L IS II USM, Speedlite 580 EX II plus 3x Yongnuo 568EX, photoflex 60" white umbrella, Westcott Apollo Orb with grid
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KenjiS "Holy crap its long!"  More info | Feb 06, 2011 23:58 | #27 krb wrote in post #11791916 This is not a replacement for the 100-400. As for pricing, imagine what he price jump would have been if the 70-200/2.8 IS had been replaced with a 70-200/2.0 IS. +1 Gear, New and Old! RAW Club Member
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DiMAn0684 Goldmember  1,933 posts Likes: 13 Joined Dec 2009 Location: Boston, MA More info | wow, built-in extender in an excellent idea. Canon 5D MkII | Canon 16-35mm f/4 | Canon 50mm f/1.8 STM | Canon 24-105mm f/4 | Tamron 70-300mm VC | Canon 430EX II | Benro A2682TB1
LOG IN TO REPLY |
themadman Cream of the Crop 18,871 posts Likes: 14 Joined Nov 2009 Location: Northern California More info | Feb 06, 2011 23:59 | #29 Kenji... totally unrelated but DeviantArt is spelled wrong in your sig... is this intentional? Will | WilliamLiuPhotography.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
shoturtle Goldmember 1,187 posts Joined Oct 2010 Location: NYC/Frankfurt A.M. More info | Feb 07, 2011 00:00 | #30 I will have to see will there be a new 100-400L. The only L I have almost brought on couple of occasion. I would like to see if they will replace it. I can live with not having F4, only place that I would use that lens is outdoor day time. Not an indoor lens. Traveling is my passion, so I am a major Frequent Flyer.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Marcsaa 528 guests, 152 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
