Feb 07, 2011 13:47 | #16 Leonid Photography wrote in post #11795458  get the sigma 10-20mm. ive had it with my 50D and it was amazing. The canon is over rated. You had no issues with the lens? Like sending it back to Sigma? I had to send my lenses in 3 times for my Sigma primes..wonder if it's the same for zooms? I'm actively lazy!!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 07, 2011 13:54 | #17 +1 for tokina...used the canon 10-22 for two weeks on a trip to India and wasnt all that impressed with my results....Love my tokina 11-16 for its build, speed, focus and color rendition. 6D, Sigma 24mm f1.4 art, sigma 85 f1.4 art
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ching Goldmember  1,370 posts Joined Apr 2010 More info | Feb 07, 2011 13:59 | #18 Tokina 11-16 f2.8 for $600 Nikon D800
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 07, 2011 14:04 | #19 johnandbentley wrote in post #11795529 +1 for tokina...used the canon 10-22 for two weeks on a trip to India and wasnt all that impressed with my results....Love my tokina 11-16 for its build, speed, focus and color rendition. This is how I feel bout my 10-22.. I would go for the 12-24 as it has a longer focal length, I'm not real fond of short zoom lenses. I know the f2.8 is godly but I probably won't need it. I'm actively lazy!!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
vegasboy Goldmember  2,366 posts Likes: 47 Joined Sep 2005 Location: Los Angeles, CA More info | Feb 07, 2011 14:06 | #20 Got my 12-24 brand new of CL for $300 -Alex
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 07, 2011 14:12 | #21 vegasboy wrote in post #11795593 Got my 12-24 brand new of CL for $300 Your kidding right? Jesus christ, makes me wanna part out the 10-22 even more. lol I'm actively lazy!!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LeonidPhotography Senior Member  715 posts Joined Mar 2009 Location: Cupertino, CA More info | Feb 07, 2011 14:12 | #22 Vixen89 wrote in post #11795481 You had no issues with the lens? Like sending it back to Sigma? I had to send my lenses in 3 times for my Sigma primes..wonder if it's the same for zooms?
Canon 6D, Canon 50mm 1.8 STM
LOG IN TO REPLY |
vegasboy Goldmember 2,366 posts Likes: 47 Joined Sep 2005 Location: Los Angeles, CA More info | Feb 07, 2011 14:13 | #23 Vixen89 wrote in post #11795633 Your kidding right? Jesus christ, makes me wanna part out the 10-22 even more. lol And it was the version II. I was stoked about it. -Alex
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 07, 2011 14:27 | #24 So apparently I'm being bombarded by my photography buddies about how I'm losing 2mm for the ultra wide experience. I didn't think there be a BIG fat issue vs. the 10-22mm. I'm actively lazy!!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
vegasboy Goldmember 2,366 posts Likes: 47 Joined Sep 2005 Location: Los Angeles, CA More info | Feb 07, 2011 14:31 | #25 12mm is still pretty darn wide.  Lens: 12-24mm f/4 Shot at 12 mm Exposure: Manual exposure, 1/250 sec, f/10, ISO 100 Just saying. -Alex
LOG IN TO REPLY |
vegasboy Goldmember 2,366 posts Likes: 47 Joined Sep 2005 Location: Los Angeles, CA More info | Feb 07, 2011 14:33 | #26 Lol sorry, Im posting portraits. Even though I dont even know what you will be primarily using the lens for. my bad. -Alex
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 07, 2011 14:41 | #27 No no keep them coming, it helps me decide, I take pictures from cars to street to portraits. I do a wide range of photography just because my friends always have some special needs to be doing it for. LOL I'm actively lazy!!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ceegee Goldmember 2,335 posts Likes: 34 Joined Mar 2008 Location: Montreal, Quebec More info | Feb 07, 2011 15:41 | #28 StageOne wrote in post #11795477 The Tokina 12-24 is a great value. I rented the Canon, but ended up buying the Tokina. It has better build and for the sizes I print, the image quality is great. I'd second this - if 12 mm is wide enough for you, the 12-24 is a really terrific lens. I bought mine used for $325. It's constant f4, solidly built and a lot of fun to use. Gear: Canon R10, Canon RFS 18-150, Canon RF 100-400
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LowriderS10 Cream of the Crop  10,170 posts Likes: 12 Joined Mar 2008 Location: South Korea / Canada More info | Feb 07, 2011 15:43 | #29 Vixen89 wrote in post #11795737 So apparently I'm being bombarded by my photography buddies about how I'm losing 2mm for the ultra wide experience. I didn't think there be a BIG fat issue vs. the 10-22mm. Umm...zoom in your lens to 12mm to find out -=Prints For Sale at PIXELS=-
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LeonidPhotography Senior Member 715 posts Joined Mar 2009 Location: Cupertino, CA More info | Feb 07, 2011 16:06 | #30 sigma 10-20mm  Red_Mustang by Lenny Litvinyuk, on FlickrCanon 6D, Canon 50mm 1.8 STM
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is MWCarlsson 1115 guests, 150 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
| 
