Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 09 Feb 2011 (Wednesday) 13:10
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Photography

 
kjonnnn
Goldmember
1,216 posts
Likes: 147
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Chicago, Illinois
     
Feb 09, 2011 13:10 |  #1

Are people seeming to be way most interested in the best camera body, (gotta have a FF), the sharpest lens, the newest feature, than knowing what it actually takes to make an interesting photograph, and developing an "eye"?

EDIT: Great Article. http://www.kenrockwell​.com/tech/notcamera.ht​m (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Alex.K
Goldmember
Avatar
1,570 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2009
Location: In the Mitten State
     
Feb 09, 2011 13:59 |  #2

I think it depends on the person.
Among my high school/college aged friends, they think having a nice camera makes an awesome photograph...and its always interesting to see their "photo shoots" with friends. Not that's bad, but...not something they should go pro in. haha.

But so often I believe most people think that if you have the best camera body with the best lens you'll take the best pictures.
Thankfully, I learned a few years back that its not the camera that takes an amazing picture, but the one behind the camera.


flickr (external link)
website (external link)
facebook (external link)
365/The Last Year project (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosGuy
Cream of the Crop, R.I.P.
Avatar
75,941 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 2610
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Middle of Michigan
     
Feb 10, 2011 09:36 |  #3

"The camera's only job is to get out of the way of making photographs."

I couldn't agree more. I used my Nikons for years & knew exactly where the controls were. I knew which way to turn the focus ring for a subject coming toward me. My film bodies NEVER failed me & THAT'S what counted. And I'd sometimes shoot 60-80 rolls of 36 a day. So I had one less worry on my mind when I was on location 1,000 miles away.

Good glass & the light is what counts with me. Could I get better shots in tough conditions like a dim high school gym with a Mk IV? I expect so. Can I get along without one? Yes, but I'll probably throw more shots away.
Could I do it without a f/1.4 or f/2 lens? Most of the time I don't think so.
At the level of Canon vs Nikon, a cam is just a box used to capture your vision. You make the important difference, so shoot lots, have fun, & don't sweat the small stuff.

I was in a camera store & heard this guy saying he needed the latest & greatest camera. From what he was saying, it would be his first SLR. I poked my nose in & said that he didn't need that camera. He said that his neighbor had one, so that's what he had to have? :D


FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1600 pixels on any side.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bbgeekchic
Member
158 posts
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Minnesota
     
Feb 10, 2011 10:30 |  #4

My first dSLR camera was a Nikon D300 (dont hate I'm using Canon :P )

I had once had NUMEROUS P&S cameras, more than I can probably even remember. Canon, Nikon, Sony, Kodak, Pentax you name it.

There is a HUGE difference going from 35mm SLR to dSLR. I was one of those that thought I initially had to have THE most expensive camera body there was. Then I got smart and did a little research before dropping that kind of cash or relying on a salesperson who may or may not be working on commission and who may or may not know anything about them.
The camera body will get you where you need to go (even my Rebel xs) provided you have the proper glass and the ability to take those amazing photos...or at least the patience to learn.


Life is nothing without the love of a friend

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Woodworker
Goldmember
2,176 posts
Joined Aug 2009
Location: East Midlands, England
     
Feb 10, 2011 16:59 |  #5

I think as with homes and cars, people like to have the most advanced camera they can afford. Maybe they think it gives them credibility at the camera club etc. Just think why so many members like to advertise the fact on these forums that they've just bought a new toy and, presumably, revel in the ensuing congratulations from idiots like me :lol:

There are people who will take pleasure in owning the most advanced gear, those who want to develop their art and others who want both, so I say each to his or her own.

David


David

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 569
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Feb 10, 2011 17:16 |  #6

kjonnnn wrote in post #11809398 (external link)
Are people seeming to be way most interested in the best camera body, (gotta have a FF), the sharpest lens, the newest feature, than knowing what it actually takes to make an interesting photograph, and developing an "eye"?

EDIT: Great Article. http://www.kenrockwell​.com/tech/notcamera.ht​m (external link)

For a photography enthusiast, it can be both/and rather than either/or. Sure, people can and do get out of balance one way or the other. I just try not to be quick to judge.


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Feb 10, 2011 17:20 |  #7

kjonnnn wrote in post #11809398 (external link)
Are people seeming to be way most interested in the best camera body, (gotta have a FF), the sharpest lens, the newest feature, than knowing what it actually takes to make an interesting photograph, and developing an "eye"?

What's really important to me in a DSLR is the ability to make it fully manual with easy-to-use controls while in manual mode. This, of course, knocks all of the Rebel series DSLRs I have ever seen out of the running. My 20D, however, works quite well.

I'd love to have a camera with a better viewfinder for manual focusing, better resolution, and lower noise when using high ISO settings, but I don't need a built-in flash, machine-gun mode, auto this and auto that, video, or many of the other things that the manufacturer's marketing groups feel sell cameras.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Miki ­ G
Goldmember
1,179 posts
Likes: 400
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Ireland
     
Feb 13, 2011 16:20 |  #8

Lots of people tend to go for the best they can afford & I have no problem with that. When I upgraded to a 7D, it was not "bells & whistles" that attracted me to it, but it's ability to suit my photography needs. Full frame cameras didn't have the specs that I required, so the 7D won on the day.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Woodworker
Goldmember
2,176 posts
Joined Aug 2009
Location: East Midlands, England
     
Feb 13, 2011 16:38 |  #9

SkipD wrote in post #11818000 (external link)
I'd love to have a camera with a better viewfinder for manual focusing, better resolution, and lower noise when using high ISO settings, but I don't need a built-in flash, machine-gun mode, auto this and auto that, video, or many of the other things that the manufacturer's marketing groups feel sell cameras.

Most of that makes a lot of sense to me Skip. Having started with SLR's in the mid-sixties, my 20D serves me very well indeed although I'd definitely appreciate a better viewfinder for manual focussing.

David


David

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
treck_dialect
Senior Member
Avatar
689 posts
Joined Jul 2010
Location: QC Philippines
     
Feb 13, 2011 20:21 |  #10

i like high megapixels.

:P


well hello
http://aleccorpuz.word​press.com/ (external link)
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 569
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Feb 14, 2011 02:56 |  #11

I personally like extra pickles on my hamburgers:)!


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dharrisphotog
Goldmember
Avatar
2,331 posts
Joined Apr 2009
     
Feb 14, 2011 15:10 |  #12

Reading these forums, it's clear that most people here only care about gear. Show me your lenses. Post your camera. T3i vs T2i. What's the best lens?

Lame questions. It's rare do I see a post that's more of getting a certain shot given a certain condition. Instead, the poor guy gets bashed for not having an L lens or a FF or lack of camera body that can shoot 1 bagillion ISO.

All that matters for a photograph is:

1) a clear subject
2) the composition
3) the lighting

I praise guys, like Henri Cartier Bresson for example, that just used 1 camera and 1 lens and took the most striking images. Without L glass.


D800 | Sigma 35mm 1.4 Art | Nikkor 85mm 1.8G | Nikkor 70-200 2.8G
Gear | Facebook (external link) | Twitter (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Google+ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 569
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Feb 14, 2011 15:21 |  #13

Razeus, you've been spending too much time in the gear sections! This particular section is oriented toward general photography discussions where, yeah, occasionally gear gets talked about but much of the discussion goes way beyond gear and focuses on many aspects of photography. And, we have sections devoted to sharing images in which subjects like light, subject matter and composition are freely talked about (and critiqued). I'd say you may do best to spend time in the photo sharing threads, post some shots, discuss some shots, and you won't hear much about "show me your lenses" or "show me your cameras". Those threads are, appropriately, found in the Lenses and Cameras sections. Stay away from those if you don't want to talk about gear!

Of course, since this forum by design includes a focu on Canon camera and lens gear, though, it doesn't make sense to protest that there are in fact sections of the forum where discussing gear is entirely appropriate!


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
emmaceleste
Member
Avatar
130 posts
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY
     
Feb 14, 2011 15:33 |  #14

I spend most of my time in the wedding and portrait section and I feel like I see the same sort of stuff Razeus pointed out... People ask for advice and someone always comes back with "Get a 50mm 1.2" or something of that sort.

I agree that good gear does make amazing shots easier to get... but I don't think it's 100% necessary that you need L lenses and professional cameras to get amazing shots.

I started doing weddings with an XTi, and a couple non-L lenses. The only thing I would do differently is have back-up equipment. Yes, rebel series aren't super easy to control, but they *are* controllable... and that's what matters to me... That I can control my shots, which means I can make them or break them. Some of the shots I took with that camera are still some of my favorites.


Canon EOS 7D Mark II EOS 6D | Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM EF 85mm f/1.8 USM EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM EF 135mm f/2L USM | Sigma 50mm f/1.4 EX DG HSM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 569
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Feb 14, 2011 15:38 |  #15

Well, my response to that is that there may always be a "someone" -- well, what can you do? That certainly doesn't characterize the forum as a whole, just the occasional "someones".

Oh, and you should get a 50L for your wedding shots:):):)!


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,223 views & 0 likes for this thread, 18 members have posted to it.
Photography
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1503 guests, 167 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.