Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 10 Feb 2011 (Thursday) 13:25
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

484RC2 head on 190CX3 legs- help!

 
travisrockphotography
Senior Member
267 posts
Joined Nov 2010
     
Feb 10, 2011 13:25 |  #1

Hey all,

I just recieved my 190CX3 and 484RC2 from a fred miranda member. My last tripod was the 7302YB so I'm new to the removeable head/legs game with tripods. I'm having a bit of trouble with the ball head. The ball head mounts fine (so it seems) onto the legs, but when the locking lever is rotated as far as it can go in the locking position, the ball head still moves- and quite freely might I add. Any insight?

I did google this and something I noticed was that the head is a mini head and smaller than the diameter on the legs so the three locking screws don't touch the head. Could this be the problem?

Any insight would help a ton. Thanks in advance!


Travis Rock Photography. (external link)
Blog. (external link)
Flickr. (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Feb 10, 2011 13:54 |  #2

The 484 is a very small head and is definitely not suitable for heavier cameras for the very reason you have discovered.

Replace the 484RC2 with either a 488RC2 (older production) or the currently produced 498RC2 and you'll have no more problems.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
travisrockphotography
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
267 posts
Joined Nov 2010
     
Feb 10, 2011 14:45 |  #3

SkipD wrote in post #11816670 (external link)
The 484 is a very small head and is definitely not suitable for heavier cameras for the very reason you have discovered.

Replace the 484RC2 with either a 488RC2 (older production) or the currently produced 498RC2 and you'll have no more problems.

Well see the thing is, i haven't even mounted a camera on it. the ball head itself just does NOT lock whatsoever.

I'll probably end up replacing it with the 498RC2 and using this for a monopod if it does work.


Travis Rock Photography. (external link)
Blog. (external link)
Flickr. (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Feb 10, 2011 15:15 |  #4

travisrockphotography wrote in post #11816989 (external link)
Well see the thing is, i haven't even mounted a camera on it. the ball head itself just does NOT lock whatsoever.

I'll probably end up replacing it with the 498RC2 and using this for a monopod if it does work.

If you're saying the ball itself isn't locked tightly within the head, maybe you're simply not rotating the handle far enough. If the handle is bottoming out on the lower end of the head, you need to re-position the handle.

To re-position the control handle, pull it out away from the ball head body about 1/4 inch or so. While it is pulled out, you can rotate it to any other position and then push it back toward the ball head body. The handle and the shaft it rides on are splined and you can choose any of quite a few relative rotational positions between the two.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
travisrockphotography
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
267 posts
Joined Nov 2010
     
Feb 10, 2011 19:21 |  #5

SkipD wrote in post #11817166 (external link)
If you're saying the ball itself isn't locked tightly within the head, maybe you're simply not rotating the handle far enough. If the handle is bottoming out on the lower end of the head, you need to re-position the handle.

To re-position the control handle, pull it out away from the ball head body about 1/4 inch or so. While it is pulled out, you can rotate it to any other position and then push it back toward the ball head body. The handle and the shaft it rides on are splined and you can choose any of quite a few relative rotational positions between the two.

No I know the control handle is splined, but thats pulled all the way down. it doesn't come in contact with the base it's mounted upon. That's why I'm confused as to why it won't lock all the way. ?!??


Travis Rock Photography. (external link)
Blog. (external link)
Flickr. (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Feb 10, 2011 19:40 |  #6

travisrockphotography wrote in post #11818807 (external link)
No I know the control handle is splined, but thats pulled all the way down. it doesn't come in contact with the base it's mounted upon. That's why I'm confused as to why it won't lock all the way. ?!??

It sounds like something's misaligned internally or broken.

I have a 484RC2 (along with a 486RC2 and a 488RC2) and it locks up tightly. It just won't hold six pounds of equipment when it's tilted off to the side without creeping.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
travisrockphotography
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
267 posts
Joined Nov 2010
     
Feb 10, 2011 19:47 |  #7

SkipD wrote in post #11818936 (external link)
It sounds like something's misaligned internally or broken.

I have a 484RC2 (along with a 486RC2 and a 488RC2) and it locks up tightly. It just won't hold six pounds of equipment when it's tilted off to the side without creeping.

That's what i unfortunately thought as well. :(

Thanks for the help!


Travis Rock Photography. (external link)
Blog. (external link)
Flickr. (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Evan ­ Idler
Goldmember
Avatar
1,600 posts
Likes: 4
Joined May 2005
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
     
Feb 10, 2011 20:16 |  #8

By any chance is the little tension know opposite the main lever knob loosed off all the way?
If you loosen it off enough, it's possible that the main knob can't produce enough pressure
to lock the ball. Failing that, it sounds like something is either missing or broken. In either
case you should be able to order any missing or broken part fairly inexpensively.

--Evan


Canon5DIII + Some L + Some non L + Some Sigma + Some Tamron + other stuff....
Patiently awaiting a winning Lottery Ticket to afford all the toys I would really like :-P

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Feb 10, 2011 20:21 |  #9

Evan Idler wrote in post #11819175 (external link)
By any chance is the little tension know opposite the main lever knob loosed off all the way?
If you loosen it off enough, it's possible that the main knob can't produce enough pressure
to lock the ball. Failing that, it sounds like something is either missing or broken. In either
case you should be able to order any missing or broken part fairly inexpensively.

--Evan

The 484RC2 has only one control lever and no knobs.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 227
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
Feb 10, 2011 20:47 |  #10

Sounds like it was bought used and the first owner may have tried to "fix" it when it couldn't hold his gear. If you're feeling adventurous, you might want to try looking up the parts diagram and seeing if you can disassemble it and put it back together right.


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Evan ­ Idler
Goldmember
Avatar
1,600 posts
Likes: 4
Joined May 2005
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
     
Feb 10, 2011 21:04 |  #11

SkipD wrote in post #11819216 (external link)
The 484RC2 has only one control lever and no knobs.

My Mistake. I went to B&H and did a quick search on the 484rc2 and
didn't pay attention to is showing me the 494rc2 as a replacement.

It doesn't look like the 484rc2 is very mechanically complicated.
Here is the parts Diagram.
http://mediacdn.shopat​ron.com …2_20031126.pdf?​1272346468 (external link)

--Evan


Canon5DIII + Some L + Some non L + Some Sigma + Some Tamron + other stuff....
Patiently awaiting a winning Lottery Ticket to afford all the toys I would really like :-P

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Evan ­ Idler
Goldmember
Avatar
1,600 posts
Likes: 4
Joined May 2005
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
     
Feb 10, 2011 21:15 |  #12

If you look at the diagram, you see that the knob pushed on a little half moon sleeve.
If the knob was unscrewed, and the little sleeve got turned and is out of alignment
with the bolt on the knob, it wouldn't be putting any pressure on the shaft to lock it
into place, but could be going in far enough to tighten up the knob.

It might be worth unscrewing the knob, and looking thru the hole to see if the
little sleeve is in place. Beyond that, other than the sleeve is missing, or the
bolt on the knob is worn off, there isn't a lot to go wrong.

--Evan


Canon5DIII + Some L + Some non L + Some Sigma + Some Tamron + other stuff....
Patiently awaiting a winning Lottery Ticket to afford all the toys I would really like :-P

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
travisrockphotography
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
267 posts
Joined Nov 2010
     
Feb 11, 2011 01:25 |  #13

Evan Idler wrote in post #11819546 (external link)
If you look at the diagram, you see that the knob pushed on a little half moon sleeve.
If the knob was unscrewed, and the little sleeve got turned and is out of alignment
with the bolt on the knob, it wouldn't be putting any pressure on the shaft to lock it
into place, but could be going in far enough to tighten up the knob.

It might be worth unscrewing the knob, and looking thru the hole to see if the
little sleeve is in place. Beyond that, other than the sleeve is missing, or the
bolt on the knob is worn off, there isn't a lot to go wrong.

--Evan

Just looked at the diagram and that may be what's wrong. I'll check that out in the AM, looks fairly simple to fix. Thanks guys! Appreciate it!


Travis Rock Photography. (external link)
Blog. (external link)
Flickr. (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,952 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
484RC2 head on 190CX3 legs- help!
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is AlainPre
1664 guests, 158 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.