Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 10 Feb 2011 (Thursday) 16:30
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

If you could just choose one lens to take on a trip?

 
Fricks
Cream of the Crop is, in fact, a title
Avatar
23,069 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 105
Joined Jan 2011
     
Feb 10, 2011 16:30 |  #1

I am going on a trip to qubec cananda to watch my bro play hockey and just play around. All I have write now is a 7d and 28-135 I'm thinking about getting a 17-40 or 135l within the next day.

If you could choose a lens an take it any where what lens would you have and where would you go?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
buy2ls
Senior Member
Avatar
534 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 29
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Long Island, NY
     
Feb 10, 2011 17:17 |  #2

24-105 L F4 and would go to San Diego Ca and go Long Range Fishing



Sony A7 MKII, Sony A&& MKII, Sony A6000, Sony Zeiss 55mm F1.8, Sony Zeiss 16-35mm F4, Sony Zeiss 24-70mm F4, Sony 70-200mm G F4, Tamron 70-300mm A mount, Canon 7DMKII, Canon 100-400mm L IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
windpig
Chopped liver
Avatar
15,925 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 2270
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Just South of Ballard
     
Feb 10, 2011 17:22 |  #3

24-105


Would you like to buy a vowel?
Go ahead, spin the wheel.
flickr (external link)
I'm accross the canal just south of Ballard, the town Seattle usurped in 1907.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
amfoto1
Cream of the Crop
10,331 posts
Likes: 146
Joined Aug 2007
Location: San Jose, California
     
Feb 10, 2011 18:42 |  #4

Personally I'd never take just one lens.

The lens you have is fine as a general walk-around lens. Replacing it with 24-105 would be ridiculous... Besides the build & dust sealing they are practically the same lens, except one costs 4X as much. Both have good IQ, both have USM, both have I.S., both cover nearly the same focal lengths, both focus pretty closely. Granted, one is a fixed f4 and the other is a variable f3.5 to f5.6 lens. But for practical purposes, there'd be little gain, just a lot of additional money out of your pocket to have a red stripe on your lens.

If you are going to be photographing the hockey, you might want a longer telephoto such as a 70-200... the bigger the aperture, the better... f2.8 if you don't object to the size and weight.

If you are going to be wandering around taking scenic shots of Quebec, you might want a wide angle lens... Possibly the best bang for your buck is the Tokina 12-24/4. It's built the way Canon used to build L-series and has good IQ, too.


Alan Myers (external link) "Walk softly and carry a big lens."
5DII, 7DII, 7D, M5 & others. 10-22mm, Meike 12/2.8,Tokina 12-24/4, 20/2.8, EF-M 22/2, TS 24/3.5L, 24-70/2.8L, 28/1.8, 28-135 IS (x2), TS 45/2.8, 50/1.4, Sigma 56/1.4, Tamron 60/2.0, 70-200/4L IS, 70-200/2.8 IS, 85/1.8, Tamron 90/2.5, 100/2.8 USM, 100-400L II, 135/2L, 180/3.5L, 300/4L IS, 300/2.8L IS, 500/4L IS, EF 1.4X II, EF 2X II. Flashes, strobes & various access. - FLICKR (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LowriderS10
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,170 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Mar 2008
Location: South Korea / Canada
     
Feb 10, 2011 18:43 |  #5

16-35 II and the Moon.


-=Prints For Sale at PIXELS=- (external link)
-=Facebook=- (external link)
-=Flickr=- (external link)

-=Gear=-

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
L.J.G.
"Not brigth enough"
Avatar
10,463 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 46
Joined Jul 2010
Location: ɹǝpun uʍop
     
Feb 10, 2011 18:46 |  #6

15-85 and anywhere but cooped up inside my poxxy office!


Lloyd
Never make the same mistake twice, there are so many new ones, try a different one each day
Gear Flick (external link)r

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ranger50
Goldmember
Avatar
1,212 posts
Joined Nov 2010
     
Feb 10, 2011 18:55 |  #7

windpig wrote in post #11818007 (external link)
24-105

Same here. Best all around there is IMHO


EOS 60D/ 70-200L/ Sunpak PF30X/ Sunpak 6600PG platinum Plus ball head Tripod 59.95 / Pelican S.S. Large Military Camera case
It's better to have it and not need it, Than to need it, and not have it.;)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ni$mo350
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,011 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Apr 2009
Location: Portland, OR
     
Feb 10, 2011 18:59 |  #8

24-105 or 17-55 for something quicker in lowe light and a bit wider.


-Chris-Website (external link)|| (external link)Facebook (external link)|| My Flickr (external link)|| Follow me!!! 500px (external link) || (external link) 5D mkii || 35L || 70-200 f/2.8L IS MKII || My bank account hates you all :cry:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LowriderS10
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,170 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Mar 2008
Location: South Korea / Canada
     
Feb 10, 2011 19:02 |  #9

ni$mo350 wrote in post #11818666 (external link)
24-105 or 17-55 for something quicker in lowe light and a bit wider.

On your 5D2? The latter would make for an unhappy holiday ;)


-=Prints For Sale at PIXELS=- (external link)
-=Facebook=- (external link)
-=Flickr=- (external link)

-=Gear=-

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ni$mo350
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,011 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Apr 2009
Location: Portland, OR
     
Feb 10, 2011 19:15 |  #10

LowriderS10 wrote in post #11818682 (external link)
On your 5D2? The latter would make for an unhappy holiday ;)

haha I read that wrong as if the op were asking for suggestions for their 7D :) For me it would be a 24-105L for sure. IS, build quality, sharp, and very versatile range from landscape to longer portrait shots.


-Chris-Website (external link)|| (external link)Facebook (external link)|| My Flickr (external link)|| Follow me!!! 500px (external link) || (external link) 5D mkii || 35L || 70-200 f/2.8L IS MKII || My bank account hates you all :cry:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
zazou
Junior Member
23 posts
Joined Jul 2010
     
Feb 10, 2011 21:33 as a reply to  @ ni$mo350's post |  #11

I live in Quebec City and if you want to take pictures of the town, better having a wide angle. My most use lenses outdoor is the 15-85.

But if he is playing at the colisee and you want pictures of the game, I must warn you than the light is bad. I'm not sure how the 15-85 would react with these parameter.


15-85mm; 17-55mm; 50 1.8; 55-250mm; 85 1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pdrober2
Goldmember
Avatar
2,318 posts
Joined Nov 2010
Location: Durham, NC
     
Feb 10, 2011 21:39 |  #12

17-55. F2.8 and is baby


Fujifilm X-T1 | 23 | 27 | 56 | 90 | 55-200
Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gasrocks
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
13,432 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Portage, Wisconsin USA
     
Feb 11, 2011 00:27 |  #13

For your 7D you want the 17-55/2.8 IS lens.


GEAR LIST
_______________

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Logan7
Senior Member
Avatar
303 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 2
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Stevens Point, WI
     
Feb 11, 2011 05:17 as a reply to  @ gasrocks's post |  #14

Sigma 30 1.4


5Dc - Sigmalux - Canon 100mm F2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
fecone
Member
58 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2011
     
Feb 11, 2011 07:07 |  #15

50 1.2L is my choice


17-404L 351.4L 501.2L 851.2iiL 2001.8L 5DC 5D3

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,064 views & 0 likes for this thread, 27 members have posted to it.
If you could just choose one lens to take on a trip?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1618 guests, 141 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.