 | HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO |
L.Morey Goldmember  1,571 posts Joined Oct 2005 Location: Modesto Ca More info | Feb 13, 2011 12:31 | #1
7d gripped,40d gripped,G9,17-40f4L, 24-70f2.8 L, 70-200f2.8 mkll L, 100-400 f4.5-5.6 L, 50f1.4 , 85f1.8 , Sigma 24-70f2.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Rubberhead Goldmember  1,899 posts Likes: 1 Joined Feb 2006 Location: South Carolina's Lowcountry More info | Feb 13, 2011 21:23 | #2 Well, I'd say that worked. EQUIPMENT: 40D | Rebel XT | EF 70-200mm f/4L IS | EF-S 10-22mm | EF 28-135mm IS | EF-S 18-55mm IS | EF 50mm 1.8 - flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
themadman Cream of the Crop  18,871 posts Likes: 14 Joined Nov 2009 Location: Northern California More info | Feb 13, 2011 21:33 | #3 Win! Will | WilliamLiuPhotography.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rockygarcia Senior Member 391 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jun 2009 Location: Orange County, CA More info | Feb 13, 2011 22:50 | #4 Very nice! Which extender did you use? 1DX | 17-40 F4L | 24-70 2.8L | 50 1.8 | 85 1.8 | 200 2.8L for sale | 70-200 2.8 IS IIL | 300 F4L | 100-400L | Kenko Pro 300 1.4x DGX | 2x Canon Tele III | 430EXII
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LowriderS10 Cream of the Crop  10,170 posts Likes: 12 Joined Mar 2008 Location: South Korea / Canada More info | Feb 13, 2011 23:01 | #5 Did you sharpen that either in camera or in post? -=Prints For Sale at PIXELS=-
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 13, 2011 23:06 | #6 Used the sigma 1.4 7d gripped,40d gripped,G9,17-40f4L, 24-70f2.8 L, 70-200f2.8 mkll L, 100-400 f4.5-5.6 L, 50f1.4 , 85f1.8 , Sigma 24-70f2.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LowriderS10 Cream of the Crop 10,170 posts Likes: 12 Joined Mar 2008 Location: South Korea / Canada More info | Feb 14, 2011 00:34 | #7 so I take it it was sharpened? -=Prints For Sale at PIXELS=-
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jericobot Cream of the Crop  5,128 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jun 2010 Location: preppingforthetrumpets More info | Feb 14, 2011 03:19 | #8 Looks good α7ii + (batis 25 f2 / zeiss 55 f1,8 / macro 90 f2,8)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Very high ISO? Looks pretty grainy in the OOF areas. The sharp parts look a bit jaggy too, like you used a tad too much PP sharpening. That being said, I'd be totally happy with that kind of result with an extender. The colors look good, it's sharp enough, and the contrast is alright. It's actually a bit overexposed, blown highlights in the edge of the basin. You could have cut the ISO, gotten the highlights back into the dynamic range, and cut down on the noise at the same time. 5Dc - Sigmalux - Canon 100mm F2
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1024 guests, 106 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
